Are ammonia emissions from field-applied slurry substantially over-estimated in European emission inventories?
Author:
Sintermann J.,Neftel A.,Ammann C.,Häni C.,Hensen A.,Loubet B.,Flechard C. R.
Abstract
Abstract. The EMEP/EEA guidebook 2009 for agricultural emission inventories reports average ammonia (NH3) emission factors (EF) by volatilisation of 55% of the applied total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) content for cattle slurry, and 35% losses for pig slurry, irrespective of the type of surface or slurry characteristics such as dry matter content and pH. In this review article, we compiled over 350 measurements of EFs published between 1991 and 2011. The standard slurry application technique during the early years of this period, when a large number of measurements were made, was spreading by splash plate, and as a result reference EFs given in many European inventories are predominantly based on this technique. However, slurry application practices have evolved since then, while there has also been a shift in measurement techniques and investigated plot sizes. We therefore classified the available measurements according to the flux measurement technique, measurement plot size, the year of measurement, and the year of publication. Medium size plots (usually circles between 20 to 50 m radius) generally yielded the highest EFs. The most commonly used measurement setups at this scale were based on the Integrated Horizontal Flux method (IHF or the ZINST method (a simplified IHF method)). Several empirical models were published in the years 1993 to 2003 predicting NH3 EFs as a function of meteorology and slurry characteristics (Menzi et al., 1998; Søgaard et al., 2002). More recent measurements that appeared subsequently show substantially lower EFs, and appear to indicate a need for a revision of the EF in emission inventories.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference99 articles.
1. Ammann, C., Brunner, A., Spirig, C., and Neftel, A.: Technical note: Water vapour concentration and flux measurements with PTR-MS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4643–4651, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4643-2006, 2006. 2. Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T., and Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.: Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 112, 153–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030, 2006. 3. Baldocchi, D. D., Hicks, B. B., and Meyers, T. P.: Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods, Ecology, 69, 1331–1340, 1988. 4. Balsari, P., Dinuccio, E., Santoro, E., and Gioelli, F.: Ammonia emissions from rough cattle slurry and from derived solid and liquid fractions applied to alfalfa pasture, Aust. J. Exp. Agr., 48, 198–201, https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07234, 2008. 5. Berkhout, A. J. C., van der Hoff, G. R., Bergwerff, J. B., Swart, D. J. P., Hensen, A., Kraai, A., Bleeker, A., Huijsmans, J. F. M., Mosquera, J., and van Pul, W. A. J.: Measuring ammonia emissions from manured fields, no. 680150003 in RIVM Report, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2008.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|