Self-nested large-eddy simulations in PALM model system v21.10 for offshore wind prediction under different atmospheric stability conditions
-
Published:2023-06-28
Issue:12
Volume:16
Page:3553-3564
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Krutova MariaORCID, Bakhoday-Paskyabi Mostafa, Reuder JoachimORCID, Nielsen Finn Gunnar
Abstract
Abstract. Large-eddy simulation (LES) resolves large-scale turbulence directly and parametrizes small-scale turbulence. Resolving micro-scale turbulence, e.g., in wind turbine wakes, requires both a sufficiently small grid spacing and a domain large enough to develop turbulent flow.
Refining a grid locally via a nesting interface effectively decreases the required computational time compared to the global grid refinement. However, interpolating the flow between nested grid boundaries introduces another source of uncertainty. Previous studies reviewed nesting effects for a buoyancy-driven flow and observed a secondary circulation in the two-way nested area. Using a nesting interface with a shear-driven flow in LES, therefore, requires additional verification.
We use PALM model system 21.10 to simulate a boundary layer in a cascading self-nested domain under neutral, convective, and stable conditions and verify the results based on the wind speed measurements taken at the FINO1 platform in the North Sea. We show that the feedback between parent and child domains in a two-way nested simulation of a non-neutral boundary layer alters the circulation in the nested area, despite spectral characteristics following the reference measurements. Unlike the pure buoyancy-driven flow, a non-neutral shear-driven flow slows down in a two-way nested area and accelerates after exiting the child domain. We also briefly review the nesting effect on the velocity profiles and turbulence anisotropy.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference23 articles.
1. Bak, C., Zahle, F., Bitsche, R., Kim, T., Yde, A., Henriksen, L., Hansen, M., Blasques, J., Gaunaa, M., and Natarajan, A.: The DTU 10-MW Reference Wind Turbine, Danish Wind Power Research 2013, Conference, 27–28 May 2013, Fredericia, Denmark, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/the-dtu-10-mw-reference-wind-turbine (last access: 27 June 2023), 2013. a 2. Beare, R. J., Macvean, M. K., Holtslag, A. A., Cuxart, J., Esau, I., Golaz,
J. C., Jimenez, M. A., Khairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., Lund,
T. S., Lundquist, J. K., McCabe, A., Moene, A. F., Noh, Y., Raasch, S., and
Sullivan, P.: An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable
Boundary Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 118, 247–272,
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10546-004-2820-6, 2006. a 3. Bratton, D. C. and Womeldorf, C. A.: The wind shear exponent: Comparing measured against simulated values and analyzing the phenomena that affect the
wind shear, in: ASME 2011 5th Int. Conf. Energy Sustain. ES 2011, 7–10 August 2011 Washington, DC, USA, PARTS A,
B, AND C, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital
Collection, 2245–2251, https://doi.org/10.1115/ES2011-54823, 2011. a 4. Clark, T. and Farley, R.: Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: A possible
mechanism for gustiness, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 329–350, 1984. a 5. Dimitrov, N., Natarajan, A., and Mann, J.: Effects of normal and extreme
turbulence spectral parameters on wind turbine loads, Renew. Energ., 101,
1180–1193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.001, 2017. a
|
|