Yukon River incision drove organic carbon burial in the Bering Sea during global climate changes at 2.6 and 1 Ma
-
Published:2022-10-28
Issue:5
Volume:10
Page:1041-1053
-
ISSN:2196-632X
-
Container-title:Earth Surface Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Surf. Dynam.
Author:
Bender Adrian M.ORCID, Lease Richard O., Corbett Lee B., Bierman Paul R.ORCID, Caffee Marc W., Jones James V., Kreiner Doug
Abstract
Abstract. River erosion affects the carbon cycle and thus climate by exporting terrigenous carbon to seafloor sediment and by nourishing CO2-consuming marine life. The Yukon River–Bering Sea system preserves rare source-to-sink records of these processes across profound changes in global climate during the past 5 million years (Ma). Here, we expand the terrestrial erosion record by dating terraces along the Charley River, Alaska, and explore linkages among previously published Yukon River
tributary incision chronologies and Bering Sea sedimentation. Cosmogenic
26Al/10Be isochron burial ages of Charley River terraces match previously documented central Yukon River tributary incision from 2.6 to 1.6 Ma during Pliocene–Pleistocene glacial expansion, and at 1.1 Ma during the 1.2–0.7 Ma Middle Pleistocene climate transition. Bering Sea sediments preserve 2–4-fold rate increases of Yukon River-derived continental detritus, terrestrial and marine organic carbon, and silicate microfossil deposition at 2.6–2.1 and 1.1–0.8 Ma. These tightly coupled records demonstrate elevated terrigenous nutrient and carbon export and concomitant Bering Sea productivity in response to climate-forced Yukon River incision. Carbon burial related to accelerated terrestrial erosion may contribute to CO2 drawdown across the Pliocene–Pleistocene and Middle Pleistocene climate transitions observed in many proxy records worldwide.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geophysics
Reference68 articles.
1. Ager, T. A., Matthews, J. V., and Yeend, W.: Pliocene Terrace Gravels of the
Ancestral Yukon River Near Circle, Alaska: Palynology, Paleobotany,
Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction and Regional Correlation, Quatern. Int., 22, 185–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-6182(94)90012-4, 1994. 2. Ahn, S., Khider, D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Lawrence, C. E.: A probabilistic
Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of benthic δ18O using a profile hidden Markov model, Dynam. Stat. Clim. Syst., 2, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1093/climsys/dzx002, 2017. 3. Bacon, C. R., Dusel-Bacon, C., Aleinikoff, J. N., and Slack, J. F.: The Late
Cretaceous Middle Fork caldera, its resurgent intrusion, and enduring
landscape stability in east-central Alaska, Geosphere, 10, 1432–1455, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01037.1, 2014. 4. Balco, G. and Rovey, C. W.: An isochron method for cosmogenic-nuclide dating
of buried soils and sediments, Am. J. Sci., 308, 1083–1114,
https://doi.org/10.2475/10.2008.02, 2008. 5. Bartoli, G., Hönisch, B., and Zeebe, R. E.: Atmospheric CO2 decline during the Pliocene intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciations, Paleoceanography, 26, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002055, 2011.
|
|