Revised treatment of wet scavenging processes dramatically improves GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 simulations of surface nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium over the United States
-
Published:2019-08-06
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:3439-3447
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Luo GanORCID, Yu FangqunORCID, Schwab JamesORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The widely used community model GEOS-Chem 12.0.0 and previous versions have
been recognized to significantly overestimate the concentrations of gaseous
nitric acid, aerosol nitrate, and aerosol ammonium over the United States.
The concentrations of nitric acid are also significantly overpredicted in
most global models participating in a recent model intercomparison study. In
this study, we show that most or all of this overestimation issue appears to
be associated with wet scavenging processes. The replacement of constant
in-cloud condensation water (ICCW) assumed in GEOS-Chem standard versions
with one varying with location and time from the assimilated meteorology
significantly reduces mass loadings of nitrate and ammonium during the
wintertime, while the employment of an empirical washout rate for nitric
acid significantly decreases mass concentrations of nitric acid and ammonium
during the summertime. Compared to the standard version, GEOS-Chem with
updated ICCW and washout rate significantly reduces the simulated annual
mean mass concentrations of nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium at surface
monitoring network sites in the US from 2.04 to 1.03, 1.89 to
0.88, and 1.09 to 0.68 µg m−3, respectively, in much
better agreement with corresponding observed values of 0.83, 0.70, and 0.60 µg m−3, respectively. In addition, the agreement of model-simulated seasonal variations of corresponding species with measurements is
also improved. The updated wet scavenging scheme improves the skill of the
model in predicting nitric acid, nitrate, and ammonium concentrations, which
are important species for air quality and climate.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference35 articles.
1. Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Wang, Q., Yantosca, R. M., Corbitt, E. S., Galarneau, E., Rutter, A. P., Gustin, M. S., Steffen, A., Schauer, J. J., Graydon, J. A., Louis, V. L. St., Talbot, R. W., Edgerton, E. S., Zhang, Y., and Sunderland, E. M.: Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 591–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-591-2012, 2012. 2. Andronache, C., Grönholm, T., Laakso, L., Phillips, V., and Venäläinen, A.: Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4739-2006, 2006. 3. Backes, A., Aulinger, A., Bieser, J., Matthias, V., and Quante, M.: Ammonia
emissions in Europe, part I: development of a dynamical ammonia emission
inventory. Atmos. Environ. 131, 55–66, 2016. 4. Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Unger, N., Metzger, S. M., Shindell, D. T., and Streets, D. G.: Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5043–5059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5043-2007, 2007. 5. Beheng, K. D. and Doms, G.: A general formulation of collection rates of
cloud and raindrops using the kinetic equation and comparison with
parameterizations, Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 59, 66–84, 1986.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|