The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity
-
Published:2019-08-21
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:3609-3639
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Neubauer DavidORCID, Ferrachat Sylvaine, Siegenthaler-Le Drian Colombe, Stier PhilipORCID, Partridge Daniel G., Tegen InaORCID, Bey Isabelle, Stanelle Tanja, Kokkola HarriORCID, Lohmann UlrikeORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 (E63H23)
as well as the previous model versions ECHAM5.5–HAM2.0 (E55H20) and ECHAM6.1–HAM2.2
(E61H22) are evaluated using global observational datasets for clouds and
precipitation. In E63H23, the amount of low clouds, the liquid and ice water path, and
cloud radiative effects are more realistic than in previous model versions.
E63H23 has a more physically based aerosol activation scheme, improvements
in the cloud cover scheme, changes in the detrainment of convective clouds,
changes in the sticking efficiency for the accretion of ice crystals by snow,
consistent ice crystal shapes throughout the model, and changes in mixed-phase
freezing; an inconsistency in ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) in
cirrus clouds was also removed. Common biases in ECHAM and in E63H23 (and in
previous ECHAM–HAM versions) are a cloud amount in stratocumulus
regions that is too low and deep convective clouds over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans
that form too close to the continents (while tropical land precipitation is
underestimated). There are indications that ICNCs are overestimated in
E63H23. Since clouds are important for effective radiative forcing due to
aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions (ERFari+aci) and
equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), differences in ERFari+aci
and ECS between the model versions were also analyzed. ERFari+aci is weaker
in E63H23 (−1.0 W m−2) than in E61H22 (−1.2 W m−2) (or E55H20;
−1.1 W m−2). This is caused by the weaker shortwave ERFari+aci
(a new aerosol activation scheme and sea salt emission parameterization in
E63H23, more realistic simulation of cloud water) overcompensating for the
weaker longwave ERFari+aci (removal of an inconsistency in ICNC in
cirrus clouds in E61H22). The decrease in ECS in E63H23 (2.5 K) compared to E61H22 (2.8 K) is due to
changes in the entrainment rate for shallow convection (affecting the cloud
amount feedback) and a stronger cloud phase feedback. Experiments with minimum cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNCmin) of
40 cm−3 or 10 cm−3 show that a higher value of CDNCmin reduces
ERFari+aci as well as ECS in E63H23.
Funder
Academy of Finland Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference127 articles.
1. Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation
2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, 2000. 2. Adler, R. F., Gu, G., and Huffman, G. J.: Estimating Climatological Bias
Errors for the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP), J. Appl.
Meteorol. Clim., 51, 84–99, 2012. 3. Adler, R. F., Sapiano, M. R. P., Huffman, G. J., Wang, J.-J., Gu, G., Bolvin,
D., Chiu, L., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R.,
and Shin, D.-B.: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly
Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation,
Atmosphere, 9, 138, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138, 2018. 4. Barahona, D., West, R. E. L., Stier, P., Romakkaniemi, S., Kokkola, H., and Nenes, A.: Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2467–2473, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010, 2010. 5. Barkstrom, B. R.: The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE), B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 65, 1170–1185,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1984)065<1170:TERBE>2.0.CO;2, 1984.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|