Abstract
Abstract. In an emergency situation shelter space is crucial for people affected by natural hazards. Emergency planners in disaster relief and mass care can greatly benefit from a sound methodology that identifies suitable shelter areas and sites where shelter services need to be improved. A methodology to rank suitability of open spaces for contingency planning and placement of shelter in the immediate aftermath of a disaster is introduced. The Open Space Suitability Index (OSSI) uses the combination of two different measures: a qualitative evaluation criterion for the suitability and manageability of open spaces to be used as shelter sites, and a second quantitative criterion using a capacitated accessibility analysis based on network analysis. For the qualitative assessment, implementation issues, environmental considerations, and basic utility supply are the main categories to rank candidate shelter sites. Geographic Information System (GIS) is used to reveal spatial patterns of shelter demand. Advantages and limitations of this method are discussed on the basis of a case study in Kathmandu Metropolitan City (KMC). According to the results, out of 410 open spaces under investigation, 12.2% have to be considered not suitable (Category D and E) while 10.7% are Category A and 17.6% are Category B. Almost two third (59.5%) are fairly suitable (Category C).
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reference80 articles.
1. ABAG: Shaken awake! Estimates of uninhabitable dwelling units and peak shelter populations in future earthquakes affecting the San Francisco Bay region, Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland, 1996.
2. Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., and Ramirez, M.: Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 126, 22–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.008, 2010.
3. Bharosa, N., Lee, J., and Janssen, M.: Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: propositions from field exercises, Inf. Syst. Front., 12, 49–65, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z, 2010.
4. Cavalieri, F., Franchin, P., Gehl, P., and Khazai, B.: Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41, 1569–1589, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2220, 2012.
5. CBS (Ed.): National Population Census 1991 (National Report), 2nd edn., Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu, 1995.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献