Tropospheric observations of CFC-114 and CFC-114a with a focus on long-term trends and emissions
-
Published:2016-12-09
Issue:23
Volume:16
Page:15347-15358
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Laube Johannes C., Mohd Hanif Norfazrin, Martinerie PatriciaORCID, Gallacher Eileen, Fraser Paul J., Langenfelds Ray, Brenninkmeijer Carl A. M., Schwander Jakob, Witrant Emmanuel, Wang Jia-Lin, Ou-Yang Chang-FengORCID, Gooch Lauren J., Reeves Claire E.ORCID, Sturges William T., Oram David E.
Abstract
Abstract. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are ozone-depleting substances as well as strong greenhouse gases, and the control of their production and use under the Montreal Protocol has had demonstrable benefits to both mitigation of increasing surface UV radiation and climate forcing. A global ban on consumption came into force in 2010, but there is evidence of continuing emissions of certain CFCs from a range of sources. One compound has received little attention in the literature, namely CFC-114 (C2Cl2F4). Of particular interest here is the differentiation between CFC-114 (CClF2CClF2) and its asymmetric isomeric form CFC-114a (CF3CCl2F) as atmospheric long-term measurements in the peer-reviewed literature to date have been assumed to represent the sum of both isomers with a time-invariant isomeric speciation. Here we report the first long-term measurements of the two isomeric forms separately, and find that they have different origins and trends in the atmosphere. Air samples collected at Cape Grim (41° S), Australia, during atmospheric background conditions since 1978, combined with samples collected from deep polar snow (firn) enable us to obtain a near-complete record of both gases since their initial production and release in the 1940s. Both isomers were present in the unpolluted atmosphere in comparably small amounts before 1960. The mixing ratio of CFC-114 doubled from 7.9 to 14.8 parts per trillion (ppt) between the start of the Cape Grim record in 1978 and the end of our record in 2014, while over the same time CFC-114a trebled from 0.35 to 1.03 ppt. Mixing ratios of both isomers are slowly decreasing by the end of this period. This is consistent with measurements of recent aircraft-based samples showing no significant interhemispheric mixing ratio gradient. We also find that the fraction of CFC-114a mixing ratio relative to that of CFC-114 increased from 4.2 to 6.9 % over the 37-year period. This contradicts the current tacit assumption used in international climate change and ozone depletion assessments that both isomers have been largely co-emitted and that their atmospheric concentration ratio has remained approximately constant in time. Complementary observations of air collected in Taiwan indicate a persisting source of CFC-114a in South East Asia which may have been contributing to the changing balance between the two isomers. In addition we present top-down global annual emission estimates of CFC-114 and CFC-114a derived from these measurements using a two-dimensional atmospheric chemistry-transport model. In general, the emissions for both compounds grew steadily during the 1980s, followed by a substantial reduction from the late 1980s onwards, which is consistent with the reduction of emission in response to the Montreal Protocol, and broadly consistent with bottom-up estimates derived by industry. However, we find that small but significant emissions of both isomers remain in 2014. Moreover the inferred changes to the ratio of emissions of the two isomers since the 1990s also indicate that the sources of the two gases are, in part, independent.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study (AFEAS): Production, sales and atmospheric release of fluorocarbons through 1995, AFEAS Administrative Organization, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. 2. Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study (AFEAS): Production and Sales of Fluorocarbons, available at: http://www.afeas.org/overview.php (last access: 4 March 2015), 2009. 3. Andersen, S. O., Sarma, K. M., and Taddonio, K. N.: Technology transfer for the ozone layer: Lessons for climate change, Earthscan Press, London, UK, 2007. 4. Baasandorj, M., Feierabend, K. J., and Burkholder, J. B.: Rate coefficients and ClO radical yields in the reaction of O(1D) with CClF2CCl2F, CCl3CF3, CClF2CClF2, and CCl2FCF3, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 43, 1–9, 2011. 5. Baasandorj, M., Fleming, E. L., Jackman, C. H., and Burkholder, J. B.: O(1D) kinetic study of key ozone depleting substances and greenhouse gases, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 275–282, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp310910f, 2013.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|