Overview: Estimating and reporting uncertainties in remotely sensed atmospheric composition and temperature
-
Published:2020-08-17
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:4393-4436
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
von Clarmann Thomas, Degenstein Douglas A., Livesey Nathaniel J., Bender StefanORCID, Braverman Amy, Butz AndréORCID, Compernolle StevenORCID, Damadeo RobertORCID, Dueck Seth, Eriksson PatrickORCID, Funke BerndORCID, Johnson Margaret C., Kasai Yasuko, Keppens ArnoORCID, Kleinert Anne, Kramarova Natalya A.ORCID, Laeng Alexandra, Langerock Bavo, Payne Vivienne H., Rozanov Alexei, Sato Tomohiro O.ORCID, Schneider MatthiasORCID, Sheese Patrick, Sofieva ViktoriaORCID, Stiller Gabriele P.ORCID, von Savigny Christian, Zawada Daniel
Abstract
Abstract. Remote sensing of atmospheric state variables typically relies on the inverse
solution of the radiative transfer equation. An adequately characterized
retrieval provides information on the uncertainties of the estimated state
variables as well as on how any constraint or a priori assumption affects
the estimate. Reported characterization data should be intercomparable between
different instruments, empirically validatable, grid-independent, usable without
detailed knowledge of the instrument or retrieval technique, traceable and still have reasonable data volume. The latter may force one to work with
representative rather than individual characterization data. Many errors derive
from approximations and simplifications used in real-world retrieval schemes,
which are reviewed in this paper, along with related error estimation schemes.
The main sources of uncertainty are measurement noise, calibration errors,
simplifications and idealizations in the radiative transfer model and retrieval
scheme, auxiliary data errors, and uncertainties in atmospheric or instrumental parameters. Some of these errors affect the result in a random way, while
others chiefly cause a bias or are of mixed character. Beyond this, it is
of utmost importance to know the influence of any constraint and prior
information on the solution. While different instruments or retrieval schemes
may require different error estimation schemes, we provide a list of
recommendations which should help to unify retrieval error reporting.
Funder
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference300 articles.
1. Adrain, R.: Research Concerning the Probabilities of the Errors which Happen in
Making Observations, &c., Analyst, or Mathematical Museum, 1, 93–109, the original pagination of the paper could not be verified. We refer to a
version available via
https://www.cs.xu.edu/math/Sources/Adrain/1808-Analyst.pdf (last access: 8 February 2018), 1808. a 2. Afe, O. T., Richter, A., Sierk, B., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: BrO
emission from volcanoes: A survey using GOME and SCIAMACHY measurements,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L24113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020994, 2004. a 3. Aitken, A. C.: On Least Squares and Linear Combinations of Observations,
P. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 55, 12–16, 1935. a 4. Aldrich, J.: R. A. Fisher and the Making of Maximum Likelihood 1912-1922,
Statist. Sci., 12, 162–176, 1997. a 5. Aldrich, J.: Doing Least Squares: Perspectives from Gauss and Yule,
Int. Stat. Rev., 66, 61–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1998.tb00406.x, 1998. a, b
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|