Capturing temporal heterogeneity in soil nitrous oxide fluxes with a robust and low-cost automated chamber apparatus
-
Published:2020-07-29
Issue:7
Volume:13
Page:4065-4078
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Lawrence Nathaniel C., Hall Steven J.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Soils play an important role in Earth's climate system through
their regulation of trace greenhouse gases. Despite decades of soil gas flux
measurements using manual chamber methods, limited temporal coverage has led
to high uncertainty in flux magnitude and variability, particularly during
peak emission events. Automated chamber measurement systems can collect
high-frequency (subdaily) measurements across various spatial scales but
may be prohibitively expensive or incompatible with field conditions. Here
we describe the construction and operational details for a robust,
relatively inexpensive, and adaptable automated dynamic (steady-state)
chamber measurement system modified from previously published methods, using
relatively low cost analyzers to measure nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon
dioxide (CO2). The system was robust to intermittent flooding of
chambers, long tubing runs (>100 m), and operational temperature extremes (−12 to 39 ∘C) and was entirely powered by solar energy.
Using data collected between 2017 and 2019 we tested the underlying principles
of chamber operation and examined N2O diel variation and rain-pulse
timing that would be difficult to characterize using infrequent manual
measurements. Stable steady-state flux dynamics were achieved during 29 min
chamber closure periods at a relatively low flow rate (2 L min−1).
Instrument performance and calculated fluxes were minimally impacted by
variation in air temperature and water vapor. Measurements between 08:00 and
12:00 LT were closest to the daily mean N2O and CO2 emission. Afternoon fluxes (12:00–16:00 LT) were 28 % higher than the daily mean for
N2O (4.04 vs. 3.15 nmol m−2 s−1) and were 22 % higher for CO2 (4.38 vs. 3.60 µmolm-2s-1). High rates of N2O emission are frequently observed after precipitation. Following four discrete rainfall events, we found a 12–26 h delay before peak N2O flux, which would be difficult to capture with manual measurements. Our observation of substantial and variable diel trends and rapid but variable onset of high N2O emissions following rainfall supports the need for
high-frequency measurements.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Akiyama, H., Tsuruta, H., and Watanabe, T.: N2O and NO emissions from soils after the application of different chemical fertilizers, Chemosphere, 2, 313–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1465-9972(00)00010-6, 2000. 2. Alves, B. J. R., Smith, K. A., Flores, R. A., Cardoso, A. S., Oliveira, W.
R. D., Jantalia, C. P., Urquiaga, S., and Boddey, R. M.: Selection of the
most suitable sampling time for static chambers for the estimation of daily
mean N2O flux from soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 46, 129–135,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.022, 2012. 3. Ambus, P. and Robertson, G. P.: Automated near-continuous measurement of
carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes from soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
62, 394–400, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200020015x, 1998. 4. Bai, M., Suter, H., Lam, S. K., Flesch, T. K., and Chen, D.: Comparison of slant open-path flux gradient and static closed chamber techniques to measure soil N2O emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1095–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1095-2019, 2019. 5. Barton, L., Wolf, B., Rowlings, D., Scheer, C., Kiese, R., Grace, P.,
Stefanova, K., and Butterbach-Bahl, K.: Sampling frequency affects estimates
of annual nitrous oxide fluxes, Scientific Reports, 5, 15912, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15912, 2015.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|