Abstract
Abstract. Apatite and zircon are among the best-studied and most widely used accessory
minerals for geochronology and thermochronology. Given that apatite and
zircon are often present in the same lithologies, distinguishing the two
phases in crushed mineral separates is a common task for geochronology,
thermochronology, and petrochronology studies. Here we present a method for
efficient and accurate apatite and zircon mineral phase identification and
verification using X-ray micro-computed tomography (microCT) of grain mounts
that provides additional three-dimensional grain size, shape, and inclusion
suite information. In this study, we analyze apatite and zircon grains from
Fish Canyon Tuff samples that went through methylene iodide (MEI) and lithium
heteropolytungstate (LST) heavy liquid density separations. We validate the
microCT results using known standards and phase identification with Raman
spectroscopy, demonstrating that apatite and zircon are distinguishable from
each other and other common phases, e.g., titanite, based on microCT X-ray
density. We present recommended microCT scanning protocols after
systematically testing the effects of different scanning parameters and
sample positions. This methodology can help to reduce time spent performing
density separations with highly toxic chemicals and visually inspecting
grains under a light microscope, and the improved mineral identification and
characterization can make geochronologic data more robust.
Funder
University of Southern California
Reference34 articles.
1. Alves, H., Lima, I., and Lopes, R. T.: Methodology for attainment of density
and effective
atomic number through dual energy technique using microtomographic images,
Appl. Radiat. Isot., 89, 6–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.01.018, 2014.
2. Buijs, W., Van Der Gen, A., Mohn, G. R., and Breimer, D. D.: The direct
mutagenic activity of
α, ω-dihalogenoalkanes in Salmonella typhimurium: Strong
correlation between chemical properties and mutagenic activity, Mutat. Res.
Lett., 141, 11–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(84)90029-0, 1984.
3. Bowring, S. A. and Schmitz, M. D.: High-precision U-Pb zircon geochronology
and the
stratigraphic record, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 53, 305–326, https://doi.org/10.2113/0530305, 2003.
4. Cooperdock, E. H. G., Ketcham, R. A., and Stockli, D. F.: Resolving the effects of 2-D versus 3-D grain measurements on apatite (U–Th)/He age data and reproducibility, Geochronology, 1, 17–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-1-17-2019, 2019.
5. Dragonfly 2021.1: Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc,
Montreal, Canada [computer software],
2021, http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly, last access: 25 August 2021.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献