3D crustal stress state of Germany according to a data-calibrated geomechanical model
-
Published:2021-08-11
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:1777-1799
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
Ahlers SteffenORCID, Henk Andreas, Hergert Tobias, Reiter KarstenORCID, Müller Birgit, Röckel Luisa, Heidbach Oliver, Morawietz SophiaORCID, Scheck-Wenderoth MagdalenaORCID, Anikiev DenisORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The contemporary stress state in the upper crust is of
great interest for geotechnical applications and basic research alike.
However, our knowledge of the crustal stress field from the data perspective
is limited. For Germany basically two datasets are available: orientations
of the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax) and the stress regime as part
of the World Stress Map (WSM) database as well as a complementary
compilation of stress magnitude data of Germany and adjacent regions.
However, these datasets only provide pointwise, incomplete and heterogeneous
information of the 3D stress tensor. Here, we present a
geomechanical–numerical model that provides a continuous description of the
contemporary 3D crustal stress state on a regional scale for Germany. The
model covers an area of about 1000×1250 km2 and extends to a depth of
100 km containing seven units, with specific material properties (density
and elastic rock properties) and laterally varying thicknesses: a
sedimentary unit, four different units of the upper crust, the lower crust
and the lithospheric mantle. The model is calibrated by the two datasets to
achieve a best-fit regarding the SHmax orientations and the minimum
horizontal stress magnitudes (Shmin). The modeled orientations of
SHmax are almost entirely within the uncertainties of the WSM data used
and the Shmin magnitudes fit to various datasets well. Only the
SHmax magnitudes show locally significant deviations, primarily
indicating values that are too low in the lower part of the model. The model is open
for further refinements regarding model geometry, e.g., additional layers
with laterally varying material properties, and incorporation of future
stress measurements. In addition, it can provide the initial stress state
for local geomechanical models with a higher resolution.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Earth-Surface Processes,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics,Soil Science
Reference134 articles.
1. Adams, J. and Bell, J. S.: Crustal stresses in Canada, in: Neotectonics of
North America, edited by: Slemmons, D. B., Engdahl, E. R., Zoback, M. D.,
and Blackwell, D. D., Geol. Soc. Am. USA, 1, 367–386,
https://doi.org/10.1130/DNAG-CSMS-NEO.367, 1991. 2. Ahlers, S., Hergert, T., and Henk, A.: Numerical Modelling of Salt-Related
Stress Decoupling in Sedimentary Basins–Motivated by Observational Data
from the North German Basin, Geosciences, 9, 19,
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010019, 2019. 3. Ahlers, S., Henk, A., Hergert, T., Reiter, K., Müller, B., Röckel,
L., Heidbach, O., Morawietz, S., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., and Anikiev, D.:
Crustal stress state of Germany – Results of a 3D geomechnical model, TUdatalib [data set],
https://doi.org/10.48328/tudatalib-437, 2021. 4. Aichholzer, C., Duringer, P., Orciani, S., and Genter, A.: New stratigraphic
interpretation of the Soultz-sous-Forêts 30-year-old geothermal wells
calibrated on the recent one from Rittershoffen (Upper Rhine Graben,
France), Geothermal Energy, 4, 1–26,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-016-0055-7, 2016. 5. Altmann, J. B., Müller, B., Müller, T. M., Heidbach, O., Tingay, M.,
and Weißhardt, A.: Pore pressure stress coupling in 3D and consequences
for reservoir stress states and fault reactivation, Geothermics, 52,
195–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.004, 2014.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|