A comparison of the use of X-ray and neutron tomographic core scanning techniques for drilling projects: insights from scanning core recovered during the Alpine Fault Deep Fault Drilling Project
-
Published:2017-05-31
Issue:
Volume:22
Page:35-42
-
ISSN:1816-3459
-
Container-title:Scientific Drilling
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci. Dril.
Author:
Williams Jack N.ORCID, Bevitt Joseph J.ORCID, Toy Virginia G.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. It is now commonplace for non-destructive X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans to be taken of core recovered during a drilling project. However, other forms of tomographic scanning are available, and these may be particularly useful for core that does not possess significant contrasts in density and/or atomic number to which X-rays are sensitive. Here, we compare CT and neutron tomography (NT) scans of 85 mm diameter core recovered during the first phase of the Deep Fault Drilling Project (DFDP-1) through New Zealand's Alpine Fault. For the instruments used in this study, the highest resolution images were collected in the NT scans. This allows clearer imaging of some rock features than in the CT scans. However, we observe that the highly neutron beam attenuating properties of DFDP-1 core diminish the quality of images towards the interior of the core. A comparison is also made of the suitability of these two scanning techniques for a drilling project. We conclude that CT scanning is far more favourable in most circumstances. Nevertheless, it could still be beneficial to take NT scans over limited intervals of suitable core, where varying contrast is desired.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Reference27 articles.
1. ASTM: (American Society for Testing, Materials), E803-91, Standard Test Method for Determining the L/D Ratio of Neutron Radiography Beams, 2013. 2. Berryman, K. R., Cochran, U. A., Clark, K. J., Biasi, G. P., Langridge, R. M., and Villamor, P.: Major earthquakes occur regularly on an isolated plate boundary fault, Science, 336, 1690–1693, 2012. 3. Caine, J. S., Evans, J. P., and Forster, C. B.: Fault zone architecture and permeability structure, Geology, 24, 1025–1028, 1996. 4. Christe, P., Bernasconi, M., Vontobel, P., Turberg, P., and Parriaux, A.: Three-dimensional petrographical investigations on borehole rock samples: A comparison between X-ray computed- and neutron tomography, Acta Geotech., 2, 269–279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-007-0045-9, 2007. 5. Freifeld, B. M., Kneafsey, T. J., and Rack, F. R.: On-site geological core analysis using a portable X-ray computed tomographic system, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., 267, 165–178, 2006.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|