Abstract
Abstract. Model equations used to either diagnose or prognose the concentration of heterogeneously nucleated ice crystals depend on combinations of cloud temperature, aerosol properties, and elapsed time of supersaturated-vapor or supercooled-liquid conditions. The validity of these equations has been questioned. Among many uncertain factors there is a concern that practical limitations on aerosol particle time of exposure to supercooled-liquid conditions, within ice nucleus counters, has biased the predictions of a diagnostic model equation. In response to this concern, this work analyzes airborne measurements of crystals made within the downwind glaciated portions of wave clouds. A streamline model is used to connect a measurement of aerosol concentration, made upwind of a cloud, to a downwind ice crystal (IC) concentration. Four parameters are derived for 80 streamlines: (1) minimum cloud temperature along the streamline, (2) aerosol particle concentration (diameter, D > 0.5 μm) measured within ascending air upwind of the cloud, (3) IC concentration measured in descending air downwind, and (4) the duration of water-saturated conditions along the streamline. The latter are between 38 and 507 s and the minimum temperatures are between −34 and −14 °C. Values of minimum temperature, D > 0.5 μm aerosol concentration, and IC concentration are fitted using the equation developed for ice nucleating particles (INPs) by by DeMott et al. (2010; D10). Overall, there is reasonable agreement among measured IC concentrations, INP concentrations derived using D10's fit equation, and IC concentrations derived by fitting the airborne measurements with the equation developed by D10.
Funder
Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences
Reference51 articles.
1. Baumgardner, D. and Korolev, A.: Airspeed corrections for optical array probe sample volumes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 14, 1224–1229, 1997.
2. Baumgardner, D., Strapp, W., and Dye, J. E.: Evaluation of the forward scattering spectrometer probe. Part II: Corrections for coincidence and dead-time losses, J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech., 2, 626–632, 1985.
3. Baumgardner, D., Jonsson, H., Dawson, W., O'Connor, D., and Newton, R.: The cloud, aerosol and precipitation spectrometer: a new instrument for cloud investigations, Atmos. Res., 59–60, 251–264, 2001.
4. Bigg, E. K.: The supercooling of water, Proc. Phys. Soc. B., 66, 688–694, 1953.
5. Braham, R. R. and Squires, P.: Cloud Physics-1974, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 55, 543–586, 1974.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献