Optimizing offshore wind export cable routing using GIS-based environmental heat maps
-
Published:2024-05-08
Issue:5
Volume:9
Page:1105-1121
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Backstrom Joni ThomasORCID, Warden Nicholas Mark, Walsh Colleen Marie
Abstract
Abstract. In the United States, there are plans to produce up to 30 GW of offshore wind power by the year 2030, resulting in numerous seabed lease areas which are currently going through the leasing or construction and operations phase. A key challenge associated with offshore wind is optimal routing and installation of the subsea power cables, which transmit power from the main offshore wind energy production area to a land-based station, where it connects to the electrical grid. By traversing a vast extent of the seafloor, the installation and operational phases of subsea power cables have the potential to result in a range of environmental impacts, which may negatively affect sensitive biological, physical, human and/or cultural resource receptors. Presented here is a case study from southeastern North Carolina to identify optimal seabed cable routes and coastal landfalls for a recently leased offshore wind farm by using a combination of publicly available data, coupled with standard environmental impact assessment methodologies and geographic information system (GIS)-based heat maps. The study identified a range of high-risk areas, in addition to a number of potential low-risk routes and landfall areas which minimize seabed user conflicts and impacts on environmentally sensitive locations. Although additional high-resolution and site-specific environmental, geological and biological surveys are required to develop a robust cable installation plan, the preliminary steps from this research optimize early-phase marine spatial planning for offshore wind projects and other similar subsea industries.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference58 articles.
1. Abramic, A., García Mendoza, G., and Haroun, R.: Introducing offshore wind energy in the sea space: Canary Islands case study developed under Maritime Spatial Planning principles, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 145, 111119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111119, 2021. 2. Albert, L., Deschamps, F., Jolivet, A., Olivier, F., Chauvaud, L., and Chauvaud, S.: A current synthesis on the effects of electric and magnetic fields emitted by submarine power cables on invertebrates, Mar. Environ. Res., 159, 104958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104958, 2020. 3. Backstrom, J. T.: Storm-driven sedimentary changes on the shoreface of a nourished beach, Kure Beach, North Carolina, MS thesis, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States, 49 pp., 2002. 4. Bergstrom, L., Kautsky, L., Malm, T., Rosenberg R., Wahlberg M., Åstrand, N., Capetillo, A., and Dan Wilhelmsson, D.: Effects of Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Wildlife – A Generalized Impact Assessment, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 1–12, 2014. 5. Berkenhagen, J., Döring, R., Fock, H. O., Kloppmann, M. H. F., Pedersen, S. A., and Schulze, T.: Decision bias in marine spatial planning of offshore wind farms: Problems of singular versus cumulative assessments of economic impacts on fisheries, Mar. Policy, 34, 733–736, 2010.
|
|