On the characteristics of the wake of a wind turbine undergoing large motions caused by a floating structure: an insight based on experiments and multi-fidelity simulations from the OC6 project Phase III
-
Published:2023-11-10
Issue:11
Volume:8
Page:1659-1691
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Cioni Stefano, Papi FrancescoORCID, Pagamonci Leonardo, Bianchini AlessandroORCID, Ramos-García Néstor, Pirrung GeorgORCID, Corniglion Rémi, Lovera Anaïs, Galván Josean, Boisard Ronan, Fontanella AlessandroORCID, Schito Paolo, Zasso AlbertoORCID, Belloli Marco, Sanvito Andrea, Persico Giacomo, Zhang Lijun, Li Ye, Zhou Yarong, Mancini Simone, Boorsma Koen, Amaral RicardoORCID, Viré AxelleORCID, Schulz Christian W., Netzband Stefan, Soto-Valle Rodrigo, Marten David, Martín-San-Román RaquelORCID, Trubat PauORCID, Molins Climent, Bergua RogerORCID, Branlard EmmanuelORCID, Jonkman JasonORCID, Robertson AmyORCID
Abstract
Abstract. This study reports the results of the second round of analyses of the Offshore Code Comparison, Collaboration, Continued, with Correlation and unCertainty (OC6) project Phase III. While the first round investigated rotor aerodynamic loading, here, focus is given to the wake behavior of a floating wind turbine under large motion. Wind tunnel experimental data from the UNsteady Aerodynamics for FLOating Wind (UNAFLOW) project are compared with the results of simulations provided by participants with methods and codes of different levels of fidelity. The effect of platform motion on both the near and the far wake is investigated. More specifically, the behavior of tip vortices in the near wake is evaluated through multiple metrics, such as streamwise position, core radius, convection velocity, and circulation. Additionally, the onset of velocity oscillations in the far wake is analyzed because this can have a negative effect on stability and loading of downstream rotors. Results in the near wake for unsteady cases confirm that simulations and experiments tend to diverge from the expected linearized quasi-steady behavior when the rotor reduced frequency increases over 0.5. Additionally, differences across the simulations become significant, suggesting that further efforts are required to tune the currently available methodologies in order to correctly evaluate the aerodynamic response of a floating wind turbine in unsteady conditions. Regarding the far wake, it is seen that, in some conditions, numerical methods overpredict the impact of platform motion on the velocity fluctuations. Moreover, results suggest that the effect of platform motion on the far wake, differently from original expectations about a faster wake recovery in a floating wind turbine, seems to be limited or even oriented to the generation of a wake less prone to dissipation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference64 articles.
1. Arabgolarcheh, A., Jannesarahmadi, S., and Benini, E.: Modeling of near wake characteristics in floating offshore wind turbines using an actuator line method, Renew. Energy, 185, 871–887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.099, 2022. 2. Bayati, I., Belloli, M., Bernini, L., Boldrin, D. M., Boorsma, K., Caboni, M., Cormier, M., Mikkelsen, R., Lutz, T., and Zasso, A.: UNAFLOW project: UNsteady Aerodynamics of FLOating Wind turbines, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1037, 072037, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072037, 2018. 3. Bergua, R., Robertson, A., Jonkman, J., Branlard, E., Fontanella, A., Belloli, M., Schito, P., Zasso, A., Persico, G., Sanvito, A., Amet, E., Brun, C., Campaña-Alonso, G., Martín-San-Román, R., Cai, R., Cai, J., Qian, Q., Maoshi, W., Beardsell, A., Pirrung, G., Ramos-García, N., Shi, W., Fu, J., Corniglion, R., Lovera, A., Galván, J., Nygaard, T. A., dos Santos, C. R., Gilbert, P., Joulin, P.-A., Blondel, F., Frickel, E., Chen, P., Hu, Z., Boisard, R., Yilmazlar, K., Croce, A., Harnois, V., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Aristondo, A., Mendikoa Alonso, I., Mancini, S., Boorsma, K., Savenije, F., Marten, D., Soto-Valle, R., Schulz, C. W., Netzband, S., Bianchini, A., Papi, F., Cioni, S., Trubat, P., Alarcon, D., Molins, C., Cormier, M., Brüker, K., Lutz, T., Xiao, Q., Deng, Z., Haudin, F., and Goveas, A.: OC6 project Phase III: validation of the aerodynamic loading on a wind turbine rotor undergoing large motion caused by a floating support structure, Wind Energ. Sci., 8, 465–485, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-8-465-2023, 2023. 4. Boorsma, K., Schepers, J. G., Gomez-Iradi, S., Herraez, I., Lutz, T., Weihing, P., Oggiano, L., Pirrung, G., Madsen, H. A., and Shen, W. Z.: Final report of IEA wind task 29 Mexnext (Phase 3), Report number ECN-E–18-003 ECN Wind Energy, https://publications.ecn.nl/ECN-E--18-003 (last access: 2 November 2023), 2018. 5. Branlard, E., Brownstein, I., Strom, B., Jonkman, J., Dana, S., and Baring-Gould, E. I.: A multipurpose lifting-line flow solver for arbitrary wind energy concepts, Wind Energ. Sci., 7, 455–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-455-2022, 2022.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|