Technical note: On HALOE stratospheric water vapor variations and trends at Boulder, Colorado
-
Published:2023-08-30
Issue:16
Volume:23
Page:9637-9646
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Abstract
Abstract. This study compares time series of stratospheric water vapor (SWV) data at 30 and 50 hPa from 1993 to 2005, based on sets of Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) profiles above the region of Boulder, CO (40∘ N, 255∘ E), and on local frost-point hygrometer (FPH) measurements. Their differing trends herein agree with most of the previously published findings. FPH trends are presumed to be accurate within their data uncertainties, and there are no known measurement biases
affecting the HALOE trends. However, the seasonal sampling from HALOE is
deficient at 40∘ N from 2001 to 2005, especially during late
winter and springtime, when HALOE SWV time series at 55∘ N clearly
show a springtime maximum. This study finds that the SWV trends from HALOE
and FPH measurements nearly agree within uncertainties at 30 hPa for the more limited
time span of 1993 to 2002. Yet, HALOE SWV at 50 hPa has significant and
perhaps uncertain corrections for interfering aerosols from 1992 to 1994.
Northern Hemisphere time series and daily SWV plots near 30 hPa from the
Limb Infrared Monitor of the Stratosphere (LIMS) experiment indicate that
there is transport of filaments of high SWV from polar to middle latitudes
during dynamically active winter and springtime periods. Although FPH
measurements sense SWV variations at all scales, the HALOE time series do
not resolve smaller-scale structures because its time series data are based
on an average of four or more occultations within a finite latitude–longitude sector. It is concluded that the variations and trends of HALOE SWV are reasonable at 40∘ N and 30 hPa from 1993 to 2002 and in accord with the spatial scales of its measurements and sampling
frequencies.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Bhatt, P. P., Remsberg, E. E., Gordley, L. L., McInerney, J. M., Brackett,
V. G., and Russell IlI, J. M.: An evaluation of the quality of Halogen
Occultation Experiment ozone profiles in the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 104, 9261–9275, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900058, 1999. 2. Charlton, A. J. and Polvani, L. M.: A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden
Warmings. Part I: Climatology and Modeling Benchmarks, J. Climate, 20,
449–469, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3996.1, 2007. 3. Curbelo, J., Chen, G., and Mechoso, C. R.: Lagrangian analysis of the northern stratospheric polar vortex split in April 2020. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093874, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093874, 2021. 4. Davis, S. M., Rosenlof, K. H., Hassler, B., Hurst, D. F., Read, W. G.,
Vömel, H., Selkirk, H., Fujiwara, M., and Damadeo, R.: The stratospheric
water and ozone satellite homogenized (SWOOSH) database: a long-term database for climate studies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 461–490,
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-461-2016, 2016. 5. Gordley, L. L., Thompson, E., McHugh, M., Remsberg, E., Russell III, J., and
Magill, B.: Accuracy of atmospheric trends inferred from the Halogen
Occultation Experiment data, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 3, 033526, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3131722, 2009.
|
|