GlobR2C2 (Global Recession Rates of Coastal Cliffs): a global relational database to investigate coastal rocky cliff erosion rate variations
-
Published:2018-08-09
Issue:3
Volume:6
Page:651-668
-
ISSN:2196-632X
-
Container-title:Earth Surface Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Surf. Dynam.
Author:
Prémaillon MélodyORCID, Regard Vincent, Dewez Thomas J. B.ORCID, Auda Yves
Abstract
Abstract. Rocky coast erosion (i.e., cliff retreat) is caused by a complex
interaction of various forcings that can be marine, subaerial or due to
rock mass properties. From Sunamura's seminal
work in 1992, it is known that cliff retreat rates are highly variable over
at least four orders of magnitude, from 1 to 10 mm yr−1.
While numerous local studies exist and explain erosion processes at specific
sites, there is a lack of knowledge at the global scale. In order to quantify and rank the
various parameters influencing erosion rates, we compiled existing local
studies into a global database called GlobR2C2 (which stands for Global Recession Rates of
Coastal Cliffs). This database reports erosion rates from publications, cliff
setting and measurement specifications; it is compiled from peer-reviewed
articles and national databases. In order to be homogeneous, marine and
climatic forcings were recorded from global models and reanalyses. Currently,
GlobR2C2 contains 58 publications that represent 1530 studied cliffs and
more than 1680 estimated erosion rate. A statistical analysis was conducted
on this database to explore the links between erosion rates and forcings at a global
scale. Rock resistance, inferred using the criterion of Hoek and Brown (1997),
is the strongest signal explaining variation in erosion rate.
Median erosion rates are 2.9 cm yr−1 for hard rocks,
10 cm yr−1 for medium rocks and 23 cm yr−1 for weak
rocks. Concerning climate, only the number of frost days (number of day per
year below 0 ∘C) for weak rocks shows a significant, positive, trend
with erosion rate. The other climatic and marine forcings do not show any
clear or significant relationship with cliff retreat rate. In this first
version, GlobR2C2, with its current encompassing vision, has broad
implications. Critical knowledge gaps have come to light and prompt a new
coastal rocky shore research agenda. Further study of these questions is
paramount if we one day hope to answer questions such as what the coastal rocky shore
response to sea-level rise or increased storminess may be.
Funder
Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geophysics
Reference63 articles.
1. Anderson, R. S., Densmore, A. L., and Ellis, M. A.: The generation and
degradation of marine terraces, Basin Res., 11, 7–19, 1999. a, b 2. Benumof, B. T., Storlazzi, C. D., Seymour, R. J., and Griggs, G. B.: The
relationship between incident wave energy and seacliff erosion rates: San
Diego County, California, J. Coastal Res., 43, 1162–1178,
2000. a, b 3. Bezerra, M. M., Moura, D., Ferreira, Ã., and Taborda, R.: Influence of
Wave
Action and Lithology on Sea Cliff Mass Movements in Central
Algarve Coast, Portugal, J. Coastal Res., 275, 162–171,
https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00004.1, 2011. a 4. Caplain, B., Astruc, D., Regard, V., and Moulin, F. Y.: Cliff retreat and sea
bed morphology under monochromatic wave forcing: Experimental study,
C. R. Geosci., 343, 471–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2011.06.003,
2011. a, b 5. Carrère, L., Lyard, F., Cancet, M., Guillot, A., and Roblou, L.: FES2012:
A new global tidal model taking advantage of nearly 20 years of
altimetry, available at:
http://www.legos.obs-mip.fr/equipes/ecola/projets/fes2012 (last access: 6 August 2018,
2012. a
Cited by
68 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|