Abstract
Abstract. Physical vulnerability is a challenging and fundamental issue in
landslide risk assessment. Previous studies mostly focus on generalized
vulnerability assessment from landslides or other types of slope failures,
such as debris flow and rockfall, while the long-term damage induced by
slow-moving landslides is usually ignored. In this study, a method was
proposed to construct physical vulnerability curves for masonry buildings by
taking the Manjiapo landslide as an example. The landslide's force acting on the
buildings' foundation is calculated by applying the landslide residual-thrust
calculation method. Considering four rainfall scenarios, the buildings'
physical responses to the thrust are simulated in terms of potential
inclination by using Timoshenko's deep-beam theory. By assuming
the landslide safety factor to be landslide intensity and inclination ratio to be
vulnerability, a physical vulnerability curve is fitted and the relative
function is constructed by applying a Weibull distribution function. To
investigate the effects of buildings' parameters that influence
vulnerabilities, the length, width, height, and foundation depth and Young's
modulus of the foundation are analysed. The validation results on the case
building show that the physical vulnerability function can give a good
result in accordance with the investigation in the field. The results
demonstrate that the building length, width, and foundation depth are the
three most critical factors that affect the physical vulnerability value. Also,
the result shows that the higher the ratio of length to width of the
building, the more serious the damage to the building. Similarly, the
shallower the foundation depth is, the more serious the damage will be. We hope that the established physical vulnerability curves can serve as tools for
the quantitative risk assessment of slow-moving landslides.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference86 articles.
1. Abdulwahid, W. M. and Pradhan, B.: Landslide vulnerability and risk
assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data
(LiDAR), Landslides, 14, 1057–1076, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0, 2017.
2. Alexander, D.: Landslide damage to buildings, Environ. Geol. Water S.,
8, 147–151, 1986.
3. Antronico, L., Borrelli, L., Coscarelli, R., and Gullà, G.: Time
evolution of landslide damages to buildings: the case study of Lungro
(Calabria, southern Italy), Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 74, 47–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0591-y, 2015.
4. Apip, Takara, K., Yamashiki, Y., Sassa, K., Ibrahim, A. B., and Fukuoka, H.: A distributed hydrological-geotechnical model using satellite-derived rainfall estimates for shallow landslide prediction system at a catchment scale, Landslides, 7, 237–258, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0214-z, 2010.
5. Barlow, J. P.: Slope movement patterns in young valley slopes in Northern
Alberta, Canada, in: Landslides in Research, Theory and Practice:
Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Landslides, Cardiff, 26–30 June 2000.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献