A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions
-
Published:2020-07-31
Issue:7
Volume:20
Page:2067-2090
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Malgwi Mark Bawa, Fuchs SvenORCID, Keiler MargrethORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The use of different methods for physical flood vulnerability assessment has
evolved over time, from traditional single-parameter stage–damage curves to
multi-parameter approaches such as multivariate or indicator-based models.
However, despite the extensive implementation of these models in flood risk
assessment globally, a considerable gap remains in their applicability to
data-scarce regions. Considering that these regions are mostly areas with a
limited capacity to cope with disasters, there is an essential need for
assessing the physical vulnerability of the built environment and
contributing to an improvement of flood risk reduction. To close this gap, we
propose linking approaches with reduced data requirements, such as
vulnerability indicators (integrating major damage drivers) and damage
grades (integrating frequently observed damage patterns). First, we present
a review of current studies of physical vulnerability indicators and flood
damage models comprised of stage–damage curves and the multivariate methods that have been applied to predict damage grades. Second, we propose a new
conceptual framework for assessing the physical vulnerability of buildings
exposed to flood hazards that has been specifically tailored for use in data-scarce
regions. This framework is operationalized in three steps: (i) developing a
vulnerability index, (ii) identifying regional damage grades, and (iii) linking resulting index classes with damage patterns, utilizing a synthetic
“what-if” analysis. The new framework is a first step for enhancing flood
damage prediction to support risk reduction in data-scarce regions. It
addresses selected gaps in the literature by extending the application of the
vulnerability index for damage grade prediction through the use of a
synthetic multi-parameter approach. The framework can be adapted to
different data-scarce regions and allows for integrating possible modifications
to damage drivers and damage grades.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference115 articles.
1. Adelekan, I., Johnson, C., Manda, M., Matyas, D., Mberu, B., Parnell, S.,
Pelling, M., Satterthwaite, D., and Vivekananda, J.: Disaster risk and its
reduction: an agenda for urban Africa, Int. Dev. Plan. Rev., 37, 33–43,
https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2015.4, 2015. 2. Adeleye, B., Popoola, A., Sanni, L., Zitta, N., and Ayangbile, O.: Poor
development control as flood vulnerability factor in Suleja, Nigeria, T.
Reg. Plan., 74, 23–35, https://doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/trp74i1.3, 2019. 3. Akukwe, T. I. and Ogbodo, C.: Spatial analysis of vulnerability to flooding
in Port Harcourt metropolis, Nigeria, SAGE Open, 5, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015575558, 2015. 4. Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., and Birkmann, J.: Operationalizing
a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for
measuring community disaster resilience, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re.,
25, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015, 2017. 5. Attems, M.-S., Schlögl, M., Thaler, T., Rauter, M., and Fuchs, S.: Risk
communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A
Q-methodology study on opinions of affected homeowners, PLoS one, 15,
e0233551, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233551, 2020a.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|