Abstract
Abstract. Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.
Funder
European Research Council
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference26 articles.
1. Annis, A., Nardi, F., Morrison, R. R., and Castelli, F., Investigating
hydrogeomorphic floodplain mapping performance with varying DTM resolution
and stream order, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 64, 525–538, 2019.
2. Bhowmik, N. G.: Hydraulic geometry of floodplains, J. Hydrol., 68, 369–374, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90221-X, 1984.
3. Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H., Wagener, T., and Viglione, A.:
Runoff prediction in ungauged basins: synthesis across processes, places and
scales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
4. Brown de Colstoun, E. C., Huang, C., Wang, P., Tilton, J. C., Tan, B., Phillips, J., and Wolfe, R. E.: Global Man-Made Impervious Surface (GMIS)
Dataset from Landsat, NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.7927/H4P55KKF, 2017.
5. Di Baldassarre, G.: Floods in a Changing Climate: Inundation Modelling,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献