Review article: The spatial dimension in the assessment of urban socio-economic vulnerability related to geohazards
-
Published:2020-06-05
Issue:6
Volume:20
Page:1663-1687
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Contreras DianaORCID, Chamorro Alondra, Wilkinson Sean
Abstract
Abstract. Society and economy are only two of the dimensions of vulnerability. This
paper aims to elucidate the state of the art of data sources, spatial
variables, indicators, methods, indexes and tools for the spatial assessment of socio-economic vulnerability (SEV) related to geohazards. This review was first conducted in December 2018 and re-run in March 2020 for the period between 2010 and 2020. The gross number of articles reviewed was 27, from which we identified 18 relevant references using a revised search query and six relevant references identified using the initial query, giving a total sample of 24 references. The most common source of data remains population censuses. The most recurrent spatial variable used for the assessment of SEV is households without basic services, while critical facilities are the most frequent spatial category. Traditional methods have been combined with more innovative and complex methods to select and weight spatial indicators and develop indices. The Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI®) remains the benchmark for the assessment of SEV and a reference for its spatial assessment. Geographic information systems (GIS) is the most common tool for conducting a spatial assessment of SEV regarding geohazards. For future spatial assessments of SEV regarding geohazards, we recommend considering 3-D spatial indexes at the microscale at the urban level and involving the community in the assessments.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference117 articles.
1. Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., and Eriksen, S.: New
indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Tyndall Centre for
Climate Research Technical Report 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, Tyndall, 2004. 2. Aguilar-Palacio, I., Gil-Lacruz, M., and Gil-Lacruz, A. I.: Salud, deporte y
vulnerabilidad socioeconómica en una comunidad urbana, Atención
Primaria, 45, 107–114, 2013. 3. Aksha, S. K., Resler, L. M., Juran, L., and Carstensen, L. W.: A geospatial
analysis of multi-hazard risk in Dharan, Nepal, Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk, 11, 88–111, 2020. 4. Alcántara-Ayala, I. and Oliver-Smith, A.: ICL Latin-American Network: on
the road to landslide reduction capacity building, Landslides, 11, 315–318,
2014. 5. Alcorn, R., Panter, K. S., and Gorsevski, P. V.: A GIS-based volcanic hazard
and risk assessment of eruptions sourced within Valles Caldera, New Mexico, J. Volcanol. Geot. Res., 267, 1–14, 2013.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|