Sensitivity of water stress in a two-layered sandy grassland soil to variations in groundwater depth and soil hydraulic parameters
-
Published:2016-01-29
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:487-503
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Rezaei M.ORCID, Seuntjens P., Joris I., Boënne W., Van Hoey S., Campling P., Cornelis W. M.
Abstract
Abstract. Monitoring and modelling tools may improve irrigation strategies in precision agriculture. We used non-invasive soil moisture monitoring, a crop growth and a soil hydrological model to predict soil water content fluctuations and crop yield in a heterogeneous sandy grassland soil under supplementary irrigation. The sensitivity of the soil hydrological model to hydraulic parameters, water stress, crop yield and lower boundary conditions was assessed after integrating models. Free drainage and incremental constant head conditions were implemented in a lower boundary sensitivity analysis. A time-dependent sensitivity analysis of the hydraulic parameters showed that changes in soil water content are mainly affected by the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks and the Mualem–van Genuchten retention curve shape parameters n and α. Results further showed that different parameter optimization strategies (two-, three-, four- or six-parameter optimizations) did not affect the calculated water stress and water content as significantly as does the bottom boundary. In this case, a two-parameter scenario, where Ks was optimized for each layer under the condition of a constant groundwater depth at 135–140 cm, performed best. A larger yield reduction, and a larger number and longer duration of stress conditions occurred in the free drainage condition as compared to constant boundary conditions. Numerical results showed that optimal irrigation scheduling using the aforementioned water stress calculations can save up to 12–22 % irrigation water as compared to the current irrigation regime. This resulted in a yield increase of 4.5–6.5 %, simulated by the crop growth model.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference66 articles.
1. Abbasi, F., Jacques, D., Simunek, J., Feyen, J., and van Genuchten, M. T.:
Inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters from
transient field experiments: Heterogeneous soil, T. ASAE, 46, 1097–1111,
2003. 2. Abbasi, F., Feyen, J., and van Genuchten, M. T.: Two-dimensional simulation
of water flow and solute transport below furrows: model calibration and
validation, J. Hydrol., 290, 63–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol2.003.11.028, 2004. 3. Akhtar, F., Tischbein, B., and Awan, U. K.: Optimizing deficit irrigation
scheduling under shallow groundwater conditions in lower reaches of Amu Darya
river basin, Water Resour. Manag., 27, 3165–3178,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0341-0, 2013. 4. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop
evapotranspiration, FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. 56, Rome, Italy, 174 pp., 1998. 5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Criteria for Evaluation of
Watershed Models, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 119,
429–442, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:3(429), 1993.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|