Multiscale evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index as a groundwater drought indicator
-
Published:2016-03-15
Issue:3
Volume:20
Page:1117-1131
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Kumar RohiniORCID, Musuuza Jude L., Van Loon Anne F.ORCID, Teuling Adriaan J.ORCID, Barthel RolandORCID, Ten Broek Jurriaan, Mai JulianeORCID, Samaniego LuisORCID, Attinger Sabine
Abstract
Abstract. The lack of comprehensive groundwater observations at regional and global scales has promoted the use of alternative proxies and indices to quantify and predict groundwater droughts. Among them, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is commonly used to characterize droughts in different compartments of the hydro-meteorological system. In this study, we explore the suitability of the SPI to characterize local- and regional-scale groundwater droughts using observations at more than 2000 groundwater wells in geologically different areas in Germany and the Netherlands. A multiscale evaluation of the SPI is performed using the station data and their corresponding 0.5° gridded estimates to analyze the local and regional behavior of groundwater droughts, respectively. The standardized anomalies in the groundwater heads (SGI) were correlated against SPIs obtained using different accumulation periods. The accumulation periods to achieve maximum correlation exhibited high spatial variability (ranges 3–36 months) at both scales, leading to the conclusion that an a priori selection of the accumulation period (for computing the SPI) would result in inadequate characterization of groundwater droughts. The application of the uniform accumulation periods over the entire domain significantly reduced the correlation between the SPI and SGI (≈ 21–66 %), indicating the limited applicability of the SPI as a proxy for groundwater droughts even at long accumulation times. Furthermore, the low scores of the hit rate (0.3–0.6) and a high false alarm ratio (0.4–0.7) at the majority of the wells and grid cells demonstrated the low reliability of groundwater drought predictions using the SPI. The findings of this study highlight the pitfalls of using the SPI as a groundwater drought indicator at both local and regional scales, and stress the need for more groundwater observations and accounting for regional hydrogeological characteristics in groundwater drought monitoring.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference57 articles.
1. AghaKouchak, A., Farahmand, A., Melton, F., Teixeira, J., Anderson, M.,
Wardlow, B., and Hain, C.: Remote sensing of drought: progress, challenges
and opportunities, Rev. Geophys., 53, 452–480, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000456,
2015. 2. Andreadis, K. M., Clark, E. A., Wood, A. W., Hamlet, A. F., and
Lettenmaier, D. P.: Twentieth-century drought in the conteminous United
States, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 985–1001, 2005. 3. Bachmair, S., Kohn, I., and Stahl, K.: Exploring the link between drought
indicators and impacts, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1381–1397,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1381-2015, 2015. 4. Barthel, R.: An indicator approach to assessing and predicting the
quantitative state of groundwater bodies on the regional scale with a special
focus on the impacts of climate change, Hydrogeol. J., 19, 525–546, 2011. 5. Bloomfield, J. P. and Marchant, B. P.: Analysis of groundwater drought
building on the standardised precipitation index approach, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 4769–4787, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4769-2013, 2013.
Cited by
144 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|