Divergence of apparent and intrinsic snow albedo over a season at a sub-alpine site with implications for remote sensing
-
Published:2022-05-06
Issue:5
Volume:16
Page:1765-1778
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Bair Edward H.ORCID, Dozier JeffORCID, Stern Charles, LeWinter Adam, Rittger KarlORCID, Savagian Alexandria, Stillinger Timbo, Davis Robert E.
Abstract
Abstract. Intrinsic albedo is the bihemispherical reflectance independent of effects
of topography or surface roughness. Conversely, the apparent albedo is the
reflected radiation divided by the incident and may be affected by
topography or roughness. For snow, the surface is often rough, and these two
optical quantities have different uses: intrinsic albedo is used in
scattering equations whereas apparent albedo should be used in energy
balance models. Complementing numerous studies devoted to surface roughness
and its effect on snow reflectance, this work analyzes a time series of
intrinsic and apparent snow albedos over a season at a sub-alpine site using
an automated terrestrial laser scanner to map the snow surface topography.
An updated albedo model accounts for shade, and in situ albedo measurements
from a field spectrometer are compared to those from a spaceborne
multispectral sensor. A spectral unmixing approach using a shade endmember
(to address the common problem of unknown surface topography) produces grain
size and impurity solutions; the modeled shade fraction is compared to the
intrinsic and apparent albedo difference. As expected and consistent with
other studies, the results show that intrinsic albedo is consistently
greater than apparent albedo. Both albedos decrease rapidly as ablation
hollows form during melt, combining effects of impurities on the surface and
increasing roughness. Intrinsic broadband albedos average 0.056 greater than
apparent albedos, with the difference being 0.052 in the near infrared or
0.022 if the average (planar) topography is known and corrected. Field
measurements of spectral surface reflectance confirm that multispectral
sensors see the apparent albedo but lack the spectral resolution to
distinguish between darkening from ablation hollows versus low
concentrations of impurities. In contrast, measurements from the field
spectrometer have sufficient resolution to discern darkening from the two
sources. Based on these results, conclusions are as follows: (1) impurity estimates
from multispectral sensors are only reliable for relatively dirty snow with
high snow fraction; (2) a shade endmember must be used in spectral mixture
models, even for in situ spectroscopic measurements; and (3) snow albedo
models should produce apparent albedos by accounting for the shade fraction.
The conclusion re-iterates that albedo is the most practical snow
reflectance quantity for remote sensing.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration U.S. Department of Defense
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference72 articles.
1. Adams, J. B., Smith, M. O., and Johnson, P. E.: Spectral mixture modeling:
A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 91, 8098–8112, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB08p08098, 1986. 2. Bair, E. H.: The CRREL UCSB Energy Site, CUES data [code], https://doi.org/10.21424/R4159Q,
2021. 3. Bair, E. H., Davis, R. E., Finnegan, D. C., LeWinter, A. L., Guttmann, E.,
and Dozier, J.: Can we estimate precipitation rate during snowfall using a
scanning terrestrial LiDAR?, Proc. 2012 Intl. Snow Sci. Workshop, Anchorage,
AK, http://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/1671 (last access: 24 August 2021), 2012. 4. Bair, E. H., Dozier, J., Davis, R. E., Colee, M. T., and Claffey, K. J.:
CUES – A study site for measuring snowpack energy balance in the Sierra
Nevada, Front. Earth Sci., 3, 58, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00058, 2015. 5. Bair, E. H., Rittger, K., Davis, R. E., Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J.:
Validating reconstruction of snow water equivalent in California's Sierra
Nevada using measurements from the NASA Airborne Snow Observatory, Water
Resour. Res., 52, 8437–8460, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018704, 2016.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|