The super-turbine wind power conversion paradox: using machine learning to reduce errors caused by Jensen's inequality
-
Published:2019-06-04
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:343-353
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
McCandless Tyler C., Haupt Sue EllenORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Wind power is a variable generation resource and therefore
requires accurate forecasts to enable integration into the electric grid.
Generally, the wind speed is forecast for a wind plant and the forecasted
wind speed is converted to power to provide an estimate of the expected
generating capacity of the plant. The average wind speed forecast for the
plant is a function of the underlying meteorological phenomena being
predicted; however, the wind speed for each turbine at the farm is also a
function of the local terrain and the array orientation. Conversion
algorithms that assume an average wind speed for the plant, i.e., the
super-turbine power conversion, assume that the effects of the local terrain
and array orientation are insignificant in producing variability in the wind
speeds across the turbines at the farm. Here, we quantify the differences in
converting wind speed to power at the turbine level compared with a
super-turbine power conversion for a hypothetical wind farm of 100 2 MW
turbines as well as from empirical data. The simulations with simulated
turbines show a maximum difference of approximately 3 % at
11 m s−1 with a 1 m s−1 standard deviation of wind speeds and
8 % at 11 m s−1 with a 2 m s−1 standard deviation of wind
speeds as a consequence of Jensen's inequality. The empirical analysis shows
similar results with mean differences between converted wind speed to power
and measured power of approximately 68 kW per 2 MW turbine. However, using
a random forest machine learning method to convert to power reduces the error
in the wind speed to power conversion when given the predictors that quantify
the differences due to Jensen's inequality. These significant differences can
lead to wind power forecasters overestimating the wind generation when
utilizing a super-turbine power conversion for high wind speeds, and
indicate that power conversion is more accurately done at the turbine level
if no other compensatory mechanism is used to account for Jensen's
inequality.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference18 articles.
1. Ahlstrom, M., Bartlett, D., Collier, C., Duchesne, J., Edelson, D., Gesino,
A., Keyser, M., Maggio, D., Milligan, M., Mohrlen, C., O'Sullivan, J., Sharp,
J., Storck, P., and Rodriguez, M.: Knowledge is power: Efficiently
integrating wind energy and wind forecasts, IEEE Power Energy M., 11, 45–52,
2013. 2. Bartlett, D.: Power Conversion: Plant-level vs. Turbine-Level, Temperature,
Static vs. Self-learning, Energy System Integration Group Forecasting
Workshop, St. Paul, MN, 21 June 2018. 3. Breiman, L.: Random Forest, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. 4. Bulaevskaya, V., Wharton, S., Clifton, A., Qualley, G., and Miller, W. O.:
Wind power curve modeling in complex terrain using statistical models, J.
Renew. Sustain. Energ., 7, 013103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904430, 2015. 5. Denny, M.: The fallacy of the average: on the ubiquity, utility and
continuing novelty of Jensen's inequality, J. Exper. Biol., 220, 139–146,
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.140368, 2017.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|