Abstract
Abstract. Carbon is a critical component of soil vitality and is crucial to our ability to produce food. Carbon sequestered in soils also provides a further regulating ecosystem service, valued as the avoided damage from global climate change. We consider the demand and supply attributes that underpin and constrain the emergence of a market value for this vital global ecosystem service: markets being what economists regard as the most efficient institutions for allocating scarce resources to the supply and consumption of valuable goods. This paper considers how a potentially large global supply of soil carbon sequestration is reduced by economic and behavioural constraints that impinge on the emergence of markets, and alternative public policies that can efficiently transact demand for the service from private and public sector agents. In essence, this is a case of significant market failure. In the design of alternative policy options, we consider whether soil carbon mitigation is actually cost-effective relative to other measures in agriculture and elsewhere in the economy, and the nature of behavioural incentives that hinder policy options. We suggest that reducing the cost and uncertainties of mitigation through soil-based measures is crucial for improving uptake. Monitoring and auditing processes will also be required to eventually facilitate wide-scale adoption of these measures.
Reference34 articles.
1. Australian Government: Carbon Farming Initiative, Clean Energy Regulator, available at: http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Carbon-Farming-Initiative (last access: 9 April 2014), 2014.
2. Baumol, W. and Oates, W.: The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
3. Carbon Brief: The state of carbon pricing: Around the world in 46 carbon markets, available at: http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2014/05/the-state-of-carbon-pricing-around-the-world-in-46-carbon-markets/, last access: 29 May 2014.
4. Cardina, J., Herms, C. P., and Doohan, D. J.: Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks, Weed Sci., 50, 448–460, 2002.
5. Carlton, R., Berry, P., and Smith, P.: Impact of crop yield reduction on GHG emissions from compensatory cultivation of pasture and forested land, Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 8, 164–175, 2010.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献