Atmospheric radiocarbon measurements to quantify CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the UK from 2014 to 2015
-
Published:2019-11-22
Issue:22
Volume:19
Page:14057-14070
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Wenger Angelina, Pugsley Katherine, O'Doherty SimonORCID, Rigby MattORCID, Manning Alistair J., Lunt Mark F., White Emily D.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. We present Δ14CO2 observations and related
greenhouse gas measurements at a background site in Ireland (Mace Head, MHD) and a tall tower
site in the east of the UK (Tacolneston, TAC) that is more strongly influenced by fossil fuel
sources. These observations have been used to calculate the contribution of
fossil fuel sources to the atmospheric CO2 mole fractions; this can be
done, as emissions from fossil fuels do not contain 14CO2 and
cause a depletion in the observed Δ14CO2 value. The
observations are compared to simulated values. Two corrections need to be
applied to radiocarbon-derived fossil fuel CO2 (ffCO2): one for
pure 14CO2 emissions from nuclear industry sites and one for a
disequilibrium in the isotopic signature of older biospheric emissions
(heterotrophic respiration) and CO2 in the atmosphere. Measurements
at both sites were found to only be marginally affected by 14CO2
emissions from nuclear sites. Over the study period of 2014–2015, the
biospheric correction and the correction for nuclear 14CO2 emissions were similar at 0.34 and 0.25 ppm ffCO2 equivalent,
respectively. The observed ffCO2 at the TAC tall tower site was not significantly
different from simulated values based on the EDGAR 2010 bottom-up inventory.
We explored the use of high-frequency CO observations as a tracer of
ffCO2 by deriving a constant ratio of CO enhancements to ffCO2
ratio for the mix of UK fossil fuel sources. This ratio was found to be 5.7 ppb ppm−1, close to the value predicted using inventories and the
atmospheric model of 5.1 ppb ppm−1. The TAC site, in the east of the UK, was
strategically chosen to be some distance from pollution sources so as to
allow for the observation of well-integrated air masses. However, this distance from pollution sources and
the large measurement uncertainty in 14CO2 lead to a large
overall uncertainty in the ffCO2, being around 1.8 ppm compared to
typical enhancements of 2 ppm.
Funder
University of Bristol
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference57 articles.
1. Adams, M., Rypdal, K., and Woodfield, M.: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission
inventory guidebook, European Environment Agency, EEA Report No. 21/2016, Copehagen, ISBN 978-92-9213-806-6, 2016. 2. Ammoura, L., Xueref-Remy, I., Vogel, F., Gros, V., Baudic, A., Bonsang, B., Delmotte, M., Té, Y., and Chevallier, F.: Exploiting stagnant conditions to derive robust emission ratio estimates for CO2, CO and volatile organic compounds in Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15653–15664, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15653-2016, 2016. 3. Arnold, T., Manning, A. J., Kim, J., Li, S., Webster, H., Thomson, D., Mühle, J., Weiss, R. F., Park, S., and O'Doherty, S.: Inverse modelling of CF4 and NF3 emissions in East Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13305–13320, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13305-2018, 2018. 4. Ballantyne, A. P., Andres, R., Houghton, R., Stocker, B. D., Wanninkhof, R., Anderegg, W., Cooper, L. A., DeGrandpre, M., Tans, P. P., Miller, J. B., Alden, C., and White, J. W. C.: Audit of the global carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake uncertainty, Biogeosciences, 12, 2565–2584, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2565-2015, 2015. 5. Balzani Lööv, J. M., Henne, S., Legreid, G., Staehelin, J., Reimann,
S., Prévôt, A. S. H., Steinbacher, M., and Vollmer, M. K.: Estimation
of background concentrations of trace gases at the Swiss Alpine site
Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–17,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009751, 2008.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|