Water vapour adjustments and responses differ between climate drivers
-
Published:2019-10-17
Issue:20
Volume:19
Page:12887-12899
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Hodnebrog ØivindORCID, Myhre GunnarORCID, Samset Bjørn H., Alterskjær KariORCID, Andrews Timothy, Boucher OlivierORCID, Faluvegi Gregory, Fläschner DagmarORCID, Forster Piers M., Kasoar MatthewORCID, Kirkevåg AlfORCID, Lamarque Jean-FrancoisORCID, Olivié Dirk, Richardson Thomas B., Shawki Dilshad, Shindell DrewORCID, Shine Keith P.ORCID, Stier PhilipORCID, Takemura ToshihikoORCID, Voulgarakis Apostolos, Watson-Parris DuncanORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Water vapour in the atmosphere is the source of a major climate feedback
mechanism and potential increases in the availability of water vapour could
have important consequences for mean and extreme precipitation. Future
precipitation changes further depend on how the hydrological cycle responds
to different drivers of climate change, such as greenhouse gases and
aerosols. Currently, neither the total anthropogenic influence on the
hydrological cycle nor that from individual drivers is constrained
sufficiently to make solid projections. We investigate how integrated water
vapour (IWV) responds to different drivers of climate change. Results from
11 global climate models have been used, based on simulations where
CO2, methane, solar irradiance, black carbon (BC), and sulfate have
been perturbed separately. While the global-mean IWV is usually assumed to
increase by ∼7 % per kelvin of surface temperature change, we find that the feedback response of IWV differs somewhat between drivers. Fast responses, which include the initial radiative effect and rapid adjustments to an external forcing, amplify these differences. The resulting net changes in IWV range from 6.4±0.9 % K−1 for sulfate to 9.8±2 % K−1 for BC. We further calculate the relationship between global changes in IWV and precipitation, which can be characterized by quantifying changes in atmospheric water vapour lifetime. Global climate models simulate a substantial increase in the lifetime, from 8.2±0.5
to 9.9±0.7 d between 1986–2005 and 2081–2100 under a high-emission
scenario, and we discuss to what extent the water vapour lifetime provides
additional information compared to analysis of IWV and precipitation
separately. We conclude that water vapour lifetime changes are an important
indicator of changes in precipitation patterns and that BC is particularly
efficient in prolonging the mean time, and therefore likely the distance,
between evaporation and precipitation.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council Horizon 2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Aggarwal, P. K., Alduchov, O. A., Froehlich, K. O., Araguas-Araguas, L. J.,
Sturchio, N. C., and Kurita, N.: Stable isotopes in global precipitation: A
unified interpretation based on atmospheric moisture residence time,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051937, 2012. 2. Aggarwal, P. K., Romatschke, U., Araguas-Araguas, L., Belachew, D.,
Longstaffe, F. J., Berg, P., Schumacher, C., and Funk, A.: Proportions of
convective and stratiform precipitation revealed in water isotope ratios,
Nat. Geosci., 9, 624–629, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2739, 2016. 3. Allen, M. R. and Ingram, W. J.: Constraints on future changes in climate
and the hydrologic cycle, Nature, 419, 224–232, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01092,
2002. 4. Andrews, T., Forster, P. M., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Jones, A.:
Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 37, L14701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl043991, 2010. 5. Bala, G., Caldeira, K., and Nemani, R.: Fast versus slow response in climate
change: implications for the global hydrological cycle, Clim. Dynam., 35,
423–434, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0583-y, 2010.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|