Abstract
Abstract. This paper develops a calibration methodology of the artificial absorbing techniques typically used by Fourier pseudo-spectral time-domain (PSTD) methods for geoacoustic wave simulations. Specifically, we consider the damped wave equation (DWE) that results from adding a dissipation term to the original wave equation, the sponge boundary layer (SBL) that applies an exponentially decaying factor directly to the wavefields, and finally, a classical split formulation of the perfectly matched layer (PML). These three techniques belong to the same family of absorbing boundary layers (ABLs), where outgoing waves and edge reflections are progressively damped across a grid zone of NABL consecutive layers. The ABLs used are compatible with a pure Fourier formulation of PSTD. We first characterize the three ABLs with respect to multiple sets of NABL and their respective absorption parameters for homogeneous media. Next, we validate our findings in heterogeneous media of increasing complexity, starting with a layered medium and finishing with the SEG/EAGE 3D salt model. Finally, we algorithmically compare the three PSTD–ABL methods in terms of memory demands and computational cost. An interesting result is that PML, despite outperforming the absorption of the other two ABLs for a given NABL value, requires approximately double the computational time. The parameter configurations reported in this paper can be readily used for PSTD simulations in other test cases, and the ABL calibration methodology can be applied to other wave propagation schemes.
Funder
Horizon 2020
HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
Reference55 articles.
1. Bérenger, J.-P.: A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys., 114, 185–200, 1994. a, b
2. Bérenger, J.-P.: Three-Dimensional Perfectly Matched Layer for the Absorption of Electromagnetic Waves, J. Comput. Phys., 127, 363–379, 1996. a
3. Bérenger, J.-P.: A historical review of the absorbing boundary conditions for electromagnetics, Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technologies, 1, 1–28, 2015. a
4. Bodony, D.-J.: Analysis of sponge zones for computational fluid mechanics, J. Comput. Phys., 212, 681–702, 2006. a
5. Bording, R.-P.: Finite difference modeling-nearly optimal sponge boundary conditions, in: SEG Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, https://onepetro.org/SEGAM/proceedings-abstract/SEG04/All-SEG04/SEG-2004-1921/91656 (last access: 10 December 2023), 2004. a, b
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献