Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy
-
Published:2024-06-03
Issue:11
Volume:17
Page:3367-3375
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Miri Robin,Pujol Olivier,Hu Qiaoyun,Goloub Philippe,Veselovskii Igor,Podvin Thierry,Ducos Fabrice
Abstract
Abstract. This study focuses on the characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity using remote sensing techniques. We employ a Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar (Lille Lidar for Atmospheric Study, LILAS), developed at the ATOLL platform, Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, Lille, France, in combination with the RPG-HATPRO-G5 microwave radiometer to enable continuous aerosol and water vapor monitoring. We identify hygroscopic growth cases when an aerosol layer exhibits an increase in both aerosol backscattering coefficient and relative humidity. By examining the fluorescence backscattering coefficient, which remains unaffected by the presence of water vapor, the potential temperature, and the absolute humidity, we verify the homogeneity of the aerosol layer. Consequently, the change in the backscattering coefficient is solely attributed to water uptake. The Hänel theory is employed to describe the evolution of the backscattering coefficient with relative humidity and introduces a hygroscopic coefficient, γ, which depends on the aerosol type. The particularity of this method revolves around the use of the fluorescence which is employed to take into account and correct the aerosol concentration variations in the layer. Case studies conducted on 29 July and 9 March 2021 examine, respectively, an urban and a smoke aerosol layer. For the urban case, γ is estimated as 0.47 ± 0.03 at 532 nm; as for the smoke case, the estimation of γ is 0.5 ± 0.3. These values align with those reported in the literature for urban and smoke particles. Our findings highlight the efficiency of the Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy in characterizing aerosol hygroscopicity. The results contribute to advance our understanding of atmospheric processes, aerosol–cloud interactions, and climate modeling.
Funder
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference27 articles.
1. Ansmann, A., Riebesell, M., Wandinger, U., Weitkamp, C., Voss, E., Lahmann, W., and Michaelis, W.: Combined raman elastic-backscatter LIDAR for vertical profiling of moisture, aerosol extinction, backscatter, and LIDAR ratio, Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O., 55, 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348608, 1992. 2. Burgos, M. A., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Alados-Arboledas, L., Baltensperger, U., Day, D., Jefferson, A., Kalivitis, N., Mihalopoulos, N., Sherman, J., Sun, J., Weingartner, E., and Zieger, P.: A global view on the effect of water uptake on aerosol particle light scattering, Sci. Data, 6, 157, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0158-7, 2019. 3. Chen, J., Li, Z., Lv, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Yan, X., Sun, Y., and Cribb, M.: Aerosol hygroscopic growth, contributing factors, and impact on haze events in a severely polluted region in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1327–1342, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019, 2019. 4. Chen, L., Peng, C., Gu, W., Fu, H., Jian, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, G., Zhu, J., Wang, X., and Tang, M.: On mineral dust aerosol hygroscopicity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13611–13626, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13611-2020, 2020. 5. Covert, D. S., Charlson, R. J., and Ahlquist, N. C.: A study of the Relationship of Chemical Composition and Humidity to Light Scattering by Aerosols, J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 968–976, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0968:ASOTRO>2.0.CO;2, 1972.
|
|