Quantitative sediment source attribution with compound-specific isotope analysis in a C3 plant-dominated catchment (central Switzerland)
-
Published:2016-03-15
Issue:5
Volume:13
Page:1587-1596
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Alewell Christine, Birkholz Axel, Meusburger Katrin, Schindler Wildhaber Yael, Mabit LionelORCID
Abstract
Abstract. As sediment loads impact freshwater systems and infrastructure, their origin in complex landscape systems is of crucial importance for sustainable management of agricultural catchments. We differentiated the sediment source contribution to a lowland river in central Switzerland by using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA). We found a clear distinction of sediment sources originating from forest and agricultural land use. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to reduce the uncertainty of sediment source attribution in: (i) using compound content (in our case, long-chain fatty acids; FAs) rather than soil organic matter content to transfer δ13C signal of FAs to soil contribution and (ii) restricting the investigation to the long-chain FAs (> C22 : 0) not to introduce errors due to aquatic contributions from algae and microorganisms. Results showed unambiguously that during base flow, agricultural land contributed up to 65 % of the suspended sediments, while forest was the dominant sediment source during high flow. This indicates that connectivity of sediment source areas within the river changes between base and high flow conditions. Uncertainty, which might occur in complex, large-scale studies due to undetected source attribution and/or CSSI signature degradation, is low because of limited data complexity in our study (i.e., two–three sources and two tracers). Our findings are the first published results highlighting (i) significant differences in compound-specific stable isotope (CSSI) signature of sediment sources from land uses dominated by C3 plant cultivation and (ii) the use of these differences to quantify sediment contribution to a small river.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference37 articles.
1. Alewell, C., Manderscheid, B., Meesenburg, H., and Bittersohl, J.:
Environmental chemistry – Is acidification still an ecological threat?,
Nature, 407, 856–857, https://doi.org/10.1038/35038158, 2000. 2. Alewell, C., Armbruster, M., Bittersohl, J., Evans, C. D., Meesenburg, H., Moritz, K., and Prechtel, A.:
Are there signs of acidification reversal in freshwaters of the low mountain ranges in Germany?,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 367–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-367-2001, 2001. 3. Blake, W. H., Ficken, K. J., Taylor, P., Russell, M. A., and Walling, D. E.:
Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments,
Geomorphology, 139, 322–329, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.036, 2012. 4. Borja, A., Galparsoro, I., Solaun, O., Muxika, I., Tello, E. M., Uriarte,
A., and Valencia, V.: The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR,
a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good
ecological status, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 66, 84–96,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.021, 2006. 5. Chikaraishi, Y. and Naraoka, H.: delta C-13 and delta D relationships among
three n-alkyl compound classes (n-alkanoic acid, n-alkane and n-alkanol) of
terrestrial higher plants, Org. Geochem., 38, 198–215,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.10.003, 2007.
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|