HAMP – the microwave package on the High Altitude and LOng range research aircraft HALO
Author:
Mech M.ORCID, Orlandi E., Crewell S.ORCID, Ament F., Hirsch L., Hagen M.ORCID, Peters G., Stevens B.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. An advanced package of microwave remote sensing instrumentation has been developed for the operation on the new German High Altitude LOng range research aircraft (HALO). The HALO Microwave Package, HAMP, consists of two nadir looking instruments: a cloud radar at 36 GHz and a suite of passive microwave radiometers with 26 frequencies in different bands between 22.24 and 183.31 ± 12.5 GHz. We present a description of HAMP's instrumentation together with an illustration of its potential. To demonstrate this potential synthetic measurements for the implemented passive microwave frequencies and the cloud radar based on cloud resolving and radiative transfer model calculations were performed. These illustrate the advantage of HAMP's chosen frequency coverage, which allows for improved detection of hydrometeors both via the emission and scattering of radiation. Regression algorithms compare HAMP retrieval with standard satellite instruments from polar orbiters and show its advantages particularly for the lower atmosphere with a reduced root mean square error by 5 and 15% for temperature and humidity, respectively. HAMP's main advantage is the high spatial resolution of about 1 km which is illustrated by first measurements from test flights. Together these qualities make it an exciting tool for gaining better understanding of cloud processes, testing retrieval algorithms, defining future satellite instrument specifications, and validating platforms after they have been placed in orbit.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference51 articles.
1. Aires, F., Paul, M., Prigent, C., Rommen, B., and Bouvet, M.: Measure and exploitation of multisensor and multiwavelength synergy for remote sensing: 2. Application to the retrieval of atmospheric temperature and water vapor from MetOp, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D02302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014702, 2011. 2. Allan, R. P., Soden, B. J., John, V. O., Ingram, W., and Good, P.: Current changes in tropical precipitation, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 025205, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025205, 2010. 3. Andersson, A., Fennig, K., Klepp, C., Bakan, S., Graßl, H., and Schulz, J.: The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and fluxes from satellite data – HOAPS-3, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2, 215–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2-215-2010, 2010. 4. Barker, H., Korolev, A., Hudak, D., Strapp, J., Strawbridge, K., and Wolde, M.: A comparison between CloudSat and aircraft data for a multilayer, mixed phase cloud system during the Canadian CloudSat-CALIPSO validation project, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009971, 2008. 5. Bauer, P. and Mugnai, A.: Precipitation profile retrievals using temperature-sounding microwave observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003572, 2003.
|
|