Development of a continuous UAV-mounted air sampler and application to the quantification of CO2 and CH4 emissions from a major coking plant
-
Published:2024-01-29
Issue:2
Volume:17
Page:677-691
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Han Tianran, Xie Conghui, Liu Yayong, Yang Yanrong, Zhang YuhengORCID, Huang Yufei, Gao Xiangyu, Zhang Xiaohua, Bao Fangmin, Li Shao-MengORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The development in uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies over the past decade has led to a plethora of platforms that can potentially enable greenhouse gas emission quantification. Here, we report the development of a new air sampler, consisting of a pumped stainless coiled tube of 150 m in length with controlled time stamping, and its deployment from an industrial UAV to quantify CO2 and CH4 emissions from the main coking plant stacks of a major steel maker in eastern China. Laboratory tests show that the time series of CO2 and CH4 measured using the sampling system is smoothed when compared to online measurement by the cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS) analyzer. Further analyses show that the smoothing is akin to a convolution of the true time series signals with a heavy-tailed digital filter. For field testing, the air sampler was mounted on the UAV and flown in virtual boxes around two stacks in the coking plant of the Shagang Group (steel producer). Mixing ratios of CO2 and CH4 in air and meteorological parameters were measured from the UAV during the test flight. A mass-balance computational algorithm was used on the data to estimate the CO2 and CH4 emission rates from the stacks. Using this algorithm, the emission rates for the two stacks from the coking plant were calculated to be 0.12±0.014 t h−1 for CH4 and 110±18 t h−1 for CO2, the latter being in excellent agreement with material-balance-based estimates. A Gaussian plume inversion approach was also used to derive the emission rates, and the results were compared with those derived using the mass-balance algorithm, showing a good agreement between the two methods.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference50 articles.
1. Allen, G., Hollingsworth, P., Kabbabe, K., Pitt, J. R., Mead, M. I., Illingworth, S., Roberts, G., Bourn, M., Shallcross, D. E., and Percival, C. J.: The development and trial of an unmanned aerial system for the measurement of methane flux from landfill and greenhouse gas emission hotspots, Waste Management, 87, 883–892, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.024, 2019. 2. Andersen, T., Scheeren, B., Peters, W., and Chen, H.: A UAV-based active AirCore system for measurements of greenhouse gases, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2683–2699, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2683-2018, 2018. 3. Andersen, T., Vinkovic, K., de Vries, M., Kers, B., Necki, J., Swolkien, J., Roiger, A., Peters, W., and Chen, H.: Quantifying methane emissions from coal mining ventilation shafts using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based active AirCore system, Atmospheric Environment: X, 12, 100135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100135, 2021. 4. Angeli, S. D., Gossler, S., Lichtenberg, S., Kass, G., Agrawal, A. K., Valerius, M., Kinzel, K. P., and Deutschmann, O.: Reduction of CO2 emission from off-gases of steel industry by dry reforming of methane, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 60, 11852–11857, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202100577, 2021. 5. Baray, S., Darlington, A., Gordon, M., Hayden, K. L., Leithead, A., Li, S.-M., Liu, P. S. K., Mittermeier, R. L., Moussa, S. G., O'Brien, J., Staebler, R., Wolde, M., Worthy, D., and McLaren, R.: Quantification of methane sources in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta by aircraft mass balance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7361–7378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7361-2018, 2018.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|