Deformation mechanisms and their microstructural indicators in the compaction of crushed salt as a geotechnical barrier

Abstract

Abstract. Following 30 years of research, it is common sense that crushed salt is the most suitable geotechnical material for encapsulating radioactive waste in a rock salt repository (e.g., Chaikowski et al., 2020). After emplacement, it provides sufficient permeability to allow outflow of unwanted canister-corrosion gases. In the long term, however, when it becomes compacted by converging cavity walls, it safely hinders any fluid flow from and to the waste. Hence, it is essential to know the evolution of (1) the material's key parameters during compaction, such as porosity and permeability, backfill resistance and viscosity; (2) the material's response to environmental controls, such as temperature, humidity, and stress; and (3) the material's long-term rheology. Here we align microstructural deformation indicators with physical processes that underlie compaction (Mills et al., 2018a). We strive to identify and – where feasible – to quantify the dominant deformation mechanisms (Blenkinsop, 2002; Jackson and Hudec, 2017). As a preliminary result, we show that the abundancy of deformation indicators increases with increasing compaction state. In early compaction, we observe more brittle mechanisms, such as grain fracturing (Fig. 1a) and cataclastic flow. At later stages, especially in the presence of moisture, plastic deformation overtakes. Therein, we observe an increased presence of indicators for pressure solution precipitation (grain boundary seams) and dislocation creep (subgrain formation, Fig. 1b), with progressing deformation. In our upcoming work, we aim at linking the observed indicators to environmental controls, such as moisture content, temperature, and strain rate by applying our approach to larger suits of samples compacted under best-known controlled conditions. Final goal is the joint interpretation with findings from in situ-compacted material (Mills et al., 2018b). Do lab tests mimic in situ processes of crushed salt compaction adequately? Can we learn how to do better by means of microstructural investigations?