Water vapor measurements inside clouds and storms using a differential absorption radar
-
Published:2024-01-26
Issue:2
Volume:17
Page:539-559
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Millán Luis F.ORCID, Lebsock Matthew D.ORCID, Cooper Ken B., Siles Jose V., Dengler Robert, Rodriguez Monje Raquel, Nehrir AminORCID, Barton-Grimley Rory A., Collins James E., Robinson Claire E., Thornhill Kenneth L., Vömel HolgerORCID
Abstract
Abstract. NASA's Vapor In-cloud Profiling Radar (VIPR) is a tunable G-band radar designed for in-cloud and precipitation humidity remote sensing. VIPR estimates humidity using the differential absorption radar (DAR) technique. This technique exploits the difference between atmospheric attenuation at different frequencies (“on” and “off” an absorption line) and combines it with the ranging capabilities of the radar to estimate the absorbing gas concentration along the radar path. We analyze the VIPR humidity measurements during two NASA field campaigns: (1) the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) campaign, with the objective of studying wintertime snowstorms focusing on east coast cyclones; and (2) the Synergies Of Active optical and Active microwave Remote Sensing Experiment (SOA2RSE) campaign, which studied the synergy between DAR (VIPR) and differential absorption lidar (DIAL, the High altitude Lidar Observatory – HALO) measurements. We discuss a comparison with dropsondes launched during these campaigns as well as an intercomparison against the ERA5 reanalysis fields. Thus, this study serves as an additional evaluation of ERA5 lower tropospheric humidity fields. Overall, in-cloud and in-snowstorm comparisons suggest that ERA5 and VIPR agree within 20 % or better against the dropsondes. The exception is during SOA2RSE (i.e., in fair weather), where ERA5 exhibits up to a 50 % underestimation above 4 km. We also show a smooth transition in water vapor profiles between the in-cloud and clear-sky measurements obtained from VIPR and HALO respectively, which highlights the complementary nature of these two measurement techniques for future airborne and space-based missions.
Funder
California Institute of Technology NASA Earth Science Technology Office
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference37 articles.
1. Andersson, E., Hólm, E., Bauer, P., Beljaars, A., Kelly, G. A., McNally, A. P., Simmons, A. J., Thépaut, J.-N., and Tompkins, A. M.: Analysis and forecast impact of the main humidity observing systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1473–1485, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.112, 2007. a 2. Ao, C. O., Waliser, D. E., Chan, S. K., Li, J.-L., Tian, B., Xie, F., and Mannucci, A. J.: Planetary boundary layer heights from GPS radio occultation refractivity and humidity profiles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017598, 2012. a 3. Battaglia, A. and Kollias, P.: Evaluation of differential absorption radars in the 183 GHz band for profiling water vapour in ice clouds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3335–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3335-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d 4. Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Riede, A., Wagner, G., Pal, S., Bauer, H., Radlach, M., and Späth, F.: Three-dimensional observations of atmospheric humidity with a scanning differential absorption Lidar, in: SPIE Proceedings, edited by: Picard, R. H., Schäfer, K., Comeron, A., and van Weele, M., SPIE, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.835143, 2009. a 5. Browell, E. V., Carter, A. F., Shipley, S. T., Allen, R. J., Butler, C. F., Mayo, M. N., Siviter, J. H., and Hall, W. M.: NASA multipurpose airborne DIAL system and measurements of ozone and aerosol profiles, Appl. Optics, 22, 522, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.22.000522, 1983. a
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|