A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation
-
Published:2024-09-04
Issue:17
Volume:17
Page:5091-5111
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Dooley Jonathan F., Minschwaner Kenneth, Dubey Manvendra K.ORCID, El Abbadi Sahar H.ORCID, Sherwin Evan D.ORCID, Meyer Aaron G., Follansbee EmilyORCID, Lee James E.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Methane (CH4) is a powerful greenhouse gas that is produced by a diverse set of natural and anthropogenic emission sources. Biogenic methane sources generally involve anaerobic decay processes such as those occurring in wetlands, melting permafrost, or the digestion of organic matter in the guts of ruminant animals. Thermogenic CH4 sources originate from the breakdown of organic material at high temperatures and pressure within the Earth's crust, a process which also produces more complex trace hydrocarbons such as ethane (C2H6). Here, we present the development and deployment of an uncrewed aerial system (UAS) that employs a fast (1 Hz) and sensitive (1–0.5 ppb s−1) CH4 and C2H6 sensor and ultrasonic anemometer. The UAS platform is a vertical-takeoff, hexarotor drone (DJI Matrice 600 Pro, M600P) capable of vertical profiling to 120 m altitude and plume sampling across scales up to 1 km. Simultaneous measurements of CH4 and C2H6 concentrations, vector winds, and positional data allow for source classification (biogenic versus thermogenic), differentiation, and emission rates without the need for modeling or a priori assumptions about winds, vertical mixing, or other environmental conditions. The system has been used for direct quantification of methane point sources, such as orphan wells, and distributed emitters, such as landfills and wastewater treatment facilities. With detectable source rates as low as 0.04 and up to ∼ 1500 kg h−1, this UAS offers a direct and repeatable method of horizontal and vertical profiling of emission plumes at scales that are complementary to regional aerial surveys and localized ground-based monitoring.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference65 articles.
1. Aeris Technologies Inc: MIRA Pico Mobile LDS Natural Gas Leak Detection System w/GPS, Aeris Technologies Inc, https://aerissensors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/MIRA-PicoMobile-LDS_191208_FINAL_quartz.pdf (last access: 19 April 2024), 2019. a, b, c 2. Anemoment LLC: Trisonica Mini User Manual, Anemoment LLC, Device User Manual, https://licor.app.boxenterprise.net/s/guv31jiwg1chpm3xiunwyo0463b5uooj, 2021. a, b, c, d 3. Barbieri, L., Kral, S., Bailey, S., Frazier, A., Jacob, J., Reuder, J., Brus, D., Chilson, P., Crick, C., Detweiler, C., Doddi, A., Elston, J., Foroutan, H., González-Rocha, J., Greene, B., Guzman, M., Houston, A., Islam, A., Kemppinen, O., Lawrence, D., Pillar-Little, E., Ross, S., Sama, M., Schmale, D., Schuyler, T., Shankar, A., Smith, S., Waugh, S., Dixon, C., Borenstein, S., and De Boer, G.: Intercomparison of Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) Measurements for Atmospheric Science during the LAPSE-RATE Campaign, Sensors, 19, 2179, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092179, 2019. a 4. Barchyn, T. E., Hugenholtz, C. H., and Fox, T. A.: Plume detection modeling of a drone-based natural gas leak detection system, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 7, 41, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.379, 2019. a, b 5. Bel Hadj Ali, N., Abichou, T., and Green, R.: Comparing estimates of fugitive landfill methane emissions using inverse plume modeling obtained with Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM), Drone Emission Monitoring (DEM), and Downwind Plume Emission Monitoring (DWPEM), J. Air Waste Manage., 70, 410–424, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1728423, 2020. a
|
|