Vergleichende Untersuchungen von Wachstumsverläufen bei Schweinen – 1. Mitteilung: Wachstumsverläufe bei Gruppen- und Einzeltiervergleichen

Author:

Schlegel M.,Matthes W.,Kanswohl N.,Expósito Polanco G.

Abstract

Abstract. Title of the paper: Comparing investigations of growth progresses of pigs. I. Growth progresses by comparisons of groups and individuals The variability of delivered groups of fattened pigs is attempted to decrease always. For that it is essential to gather knowledges about the typical, separate development periods and points of inflection of growth patterns in order to work out indications for influencing the process engineering. Statements coming from experimental tests arn´t transferable without doubt. Therefore, it is of importance to realize also tests under production conditions. Under the tests, the first realized in farm I 1989, the second realized in the farms IIa/ IIb 2005, here ought be published the investigation of pig groups and individuals in 1989. For 276 hogs the ages and the weights were registred five times. For each animal were ascertained the function parameters (growth function of Lehmann) from their dataset. Consequently could be determined the “theoretical possible end weight” (xE). According to these book values the datasets were sorted increasingly and divided into groups. Group 1 contains the animals with low xE and group 11 the with high. The comparison of pig groups leads to following statements: 1. A low xE corresponds with a high growth intensity (WI) and contrariwise. 2. The higher the WI the earlier the animals reach their maximum of daily live weight gains (tZmax) and the faster the animals cross this maximum. These statements were confronted with those of individuals. The selected animals 117 and 59 show identical xE. The higher WI express in a faster crossing of the tZmax (confirmation of the second statement), but the faster reaching cannot be confirmed. At a compare of two other animals with same WI can be determined that they have different xE. With it the first statement can't be confirmed in the complete consequence.

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3