Modeling vegetation and carbon dynamics of managed grasslands at the global scale with LPJmL 3.6
-
Published:2018-02-01
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:429-451
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Rolinski Susanne, Müller Christoph, Heinke JensORCID, Weindl IsabelleORCID, Biewald Anne, Bodirsky Benjamin Leon, Bondeau Alberte, Boons-Prins Eltje R., Bouwman Alexander F.ORCID, Leffelaar Peter A., te Roller Johnny A., Schaphoff Sibyll, Thonicke KirstenORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Grassland management affects the carbon fluxes of one-third of the global land area and is thus an important factor for the global carbon budget. Nonetheless, this aspect has been largely neglected or underrepresented in global carbon cycle models. We investigate four harvesting schemes for the managed grassland implementation of the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed Land (LPJmL) that facilitate a better representation of actual management systems globally. We describe the model implementation and analyze simulation results with respect to harvest, net primary productivity and soil carbon content and by evaluating them against reported grass yields in Europe. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for differences in grassland management by assessing potential livestock grazing densities as well as the impacts of grazing, grazing intensities and mowing systems on soil carbon stocks. Grazing leads to soil carbon losses in polar or arid regions even at moderate livestock densities (< 0.4 livestock units per hectare – LSU ha−1) but not in temperate regions even at much higher densities (0.4 to 1.2 LSU ha−1). Applying LPJmL with the new grassland management options enables assessments of the global grassland production and its impact on the terrestrial biogeochemical cycles but requires a global data set on current grassland management.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference72 articles.
1. Abril, A. and Bucher, E. H.: The effects of overgrazing on soil microbial community and fertility in the Chaco dry savannas of Argentina, Appl. Soil Ecol., 12, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00162-0, 1999. 2. Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., Schamm, K., Schneider, U., and Ziese, M.: A description of the global land-surface precipitation data products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre with sample applications including centennial (trend) analysis from 1901–present, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 71–99, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-71-2013, 2013. 3. Blanchet, K., Moechnig, H., and DeJong-Hughes, J.: Grazing systems planning guide, Tech. rep., University of Minnesota, Extension Service, University of Minnesota Extension Service Distribution Center, 405 Coffey Hall, 1420 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108-6068, USA, 2003. 4. Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Cramer, W., and Gerten, D.: Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance, Global Change Biol., 13, 679–706, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x, 2007. 5. Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M., and Batjes, N. H.: Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001389, 2002.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|