Evaluation of the atmosphere–land–ocean–sea ice interface processes in the Regional Arctic System Model version 1 (RASM1) using local and globally gridded observations
-
Published:2018-12-04
Issue:12
Volume:11
Page:4817-4841
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Brunke Michael A., Cassano John J., Dawson NicholasORCID, DuVivier Alice K., Gutowski Jr. William J.ORCID, Hamman JosephORCID, Maslowski WieslawORCID, Nijssen BartORCID, Reeves Eyre J. E. JackORCID, Renteria José C., Roberts AndrewORCID, Zeng XubinORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Regional Arctic System Model version 1 (RASM1) has been developed to
provide high-resolution simulations of the Arctic atmosphere–ocean–sea
ice–land system. Here, we provide a baseline for the capability of RASM to
simulate interface processes by comparing retrospective simulations from
RASM1 for 1990–2014 with the Community Earth System Model version 1 (CESM1)
and the spread across three recent reanalyses. Evaluations of surface and
2 m air temperature, surface radiative and turbulent fluxes, precipitation,
and snow depth in the various models and reanalyses are performed using
global and regional datasets and a variety of in situ datasets, including
flux towers over land, ship cruises over oceans, and a field experiment over
sea ice. These evaluations reveal that RASM1 simulates precipitation that is
similar to CESM1, reanalyses, and satellite gauge combined precipitation
datasets over all river basins within the RASM domain. Snow depth in RASM is
closer to upscaled surface observations over a flatter region than in more
mountainous terrain in Alaska. The sea ice–atmosphere interface is well
simulated in regards to radiation fluxes, which generally fall within
observational uncertainty. RASM1 monthly mean surface temperature and
radiation biases are shown to be due to biases in the simulated mean diurnal
cycle. At some locations, a minimal monthly mean bias is shown to be due to
the compensation of roughly equal but opposite biases between daytime and
nighttime, whereas this is not the case at locations where the monthly mean
bias is higher in magnitude. These biases are derived from errors in the
diurnal cycle of the energy balance (radiative and turbulent flux)
components. Therefore, the key to advancing the simulation of SAT and the
surface energy budget would be to improve the representation of the diurnal
cycle of radiative and turbulent fluxes. The development of RASM2 aims to
address these biases. Still, an advantage of RASM1 is that it captures the
interannual and interdecadal variability in the climate of the Arctic region,
which global models like CESM cannot do.
Funder
Office of Science National Science Foundation National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference109 articles.
1. Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P.-P., Janowiak,
J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind,
J., Arkin, P., and Nelkin, E.: The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present), J.
Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, 2003. 2. Adler, R. F., Gu, G., and Huffman, G. J.: Estimating climatological bias
errors for the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP), J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 84–99,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-052.1, 2012. 3. Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S.,
Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., Fuentes, J., Goldstein, A.,
Katul, G., Law, B., Lee, X., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Munger, W., Oechel, W.,
Paw U, K. T., Pilegaard, K., Schmid, H. P., Valentini, R., Verma, S., Vesala,
T., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and
spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and
energy flux densities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 2415–2434, 2001. 4. Barlage, M., Zeng, X., Wei, H., and Mitchell, K. E.: A global 0.05∘
maximum albedo dataset of snow-covered land based on MODIS observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022881, 2005. 5. Behrangi, A., Christensen, M., Richardson, M., Lebsock, M., Stephens, G.,
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D., Adler, R. F., Gardner, A., Lambrigtsen, B., and
Fetzer, E.: Status of high-latitude precipitation estimates from observations
and reanalyses, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4468–4486,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024546, 2016.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|