Potential impacts of cable bacteria activity on hard-shelled benthic foraminifera: implications for their interpretation as bioindicators or paleoproxies
-
Published:2024-02-20
Issue:4
Volume:21
Page:911-928
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Daviray MaximeORCID, Geslin Emmanuelle, Risgaard-Petersen Nils, Scholz Vincent V., Fouet MarieORCID, Metzger EdouardORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Hard-shelled foraminifera are protists able to build a calcareous or agglutinated shell (called a “test”). Here we study the impact of sediment acidification on calcareous test preservation. For this study, sediment cores were sampled in the macrotidal Auray estuary located on the French Atlantic coast. Living and dead foraminifera were quantified until 5 cm depth and discriminated using the Cell-Tracker™ Green vital marker. The pH and oxygen profiles combined with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) suggested that cable bacteria were most likely to cause the acidifying process. Cable bacteria (CB) are filamentous bacteria coupling sulfide oxidation to oxygen reduction over centimetre distances, generating a strong pH gradient within the first few centimetres of the sediment that could affect the microhabitats occupied by benthic foraminifera. On two different intertidal mudflats, volumetric filament densities have been estimated. They were comparable to those observed in the literature for coastal environments, with 7.4 ± 0.4 and 74.4 ± 5.0 m cm−3 per bulk sediment, respectively. Highly contrasting sediment acidification (from low to very intense) was described from 1.0 to 2.4 ΔpH. This seems to lead to various dissolution stages of the foraminiferal calcareous test from intact to fully dissolved tests revealing the organic lining. The dissolution scale is based on observations of living Ammonia spp. and Haynesina germanica specimens under a scanning electronic microscope. Furthermore, dead foraminiferal assemblages showed a strong calcareous test loss and an organic lining accumulation throughout depth under low pH, hampering the test preservation in deep sediment. These changes in both living and dead foraminiferal assemblages suggest that cable bacteria must be considered in ecological monitoring and historical studies using foraminifera as bioindicators and paleoenvironmental proxies.
Funder
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Office Français de la Biodiversité
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference98 articles.
1. Aller, R. C., Aller, J. Y., Zhu, Q., Heilbrun, C., Klingensmith, I., and Kaushik, A.: Worm tubes as conduits for the electrogenic microbial grid in marine sediments, Sci. Ad., 5, eaaw3651, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw3651, 2019. 2. Alve, E. and Murray, J. W.: Marginal marine environments of the Skagerrak and Kattegat: a baseline study of living (stained) benthic foraminiferal ecology, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 146, 171–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00131-X, 1999. 3. Alve, E. and Nagy, J.: Estuarine foraminiferal distribution in Sandebukta, a branch of the Oslo Fjord (Norway), J. Foramin. Res., 16, 261–284, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.16.4.261, 1986. 4. Anschutz, P., Chaillou, G., and Lecroart, P.: Phosphorus diagenesis in sediment of the Thau Lagoon, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 72, 447–456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.012, 2007. 5. Bentov, S., Brownlee, C., and Erez, J.: The role of seawater endocytosis in the biomineralization process in calcareous foraminifera, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 21500–21504, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906636106, 2009.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|