Evaluation of the Sequential Spot Sampler (S3) for time-resolved measurement of PM<sub>2.5</sub> sulfate and nitrate through lab and field measurements
-
Published:2016-02-16
Issue:2
Volume:9
Page:525-533
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Hecobian A.ORCID, Evanoski-Cole A., Eiguren-Fernandez A., Sullivan A. P., Lewis G. S., Hering S. V.ORCID, Collett Jr. J. L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Sequential Spot Sampler (S3), a newly developed instrument to collect aerosols for time-resolved chemical composition measurements, was evaluated in the laboratory and field for the measurement of particulate sulfate and nitrate. The S3 uses a multi-temperature condensation growth tube to grow individual aerosols to droplets which are then deposited as a ∼ 1 mm diameter dry spot at the end of the growth tube in a 100 µL well of a multi-well plate. The well plate advances automatically to provide a sequence of time-resolved samples. The collected aerosols are subsequently analyzed in the laboratory. The sample is concentrated during the collection process, and the laboratory extraction and analysis steps can be automated. The well plate, as received from the field, is placed onto a needle-based autosampler that adds liquid for sample extraction and injects sample extract from each well onto an ion chromatograph for analysis. Laboratory evaluation for sulfate and nitrate ions showed that poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) used as well plate material does not contribute any artifacts; a 60 min extraction procedure leads to the recovery of sulfate and nitrate from the dry spots at above 95 % extraction efficiency; and samples stored frozen and analyzed up to 23 months later show less than a 10 % change in sulfate and nitrate concentrations. The limit of detection was 0.5 µg m−3 for sulfate and 0.2 µg m−3 for nitrate for a 1 h sampling period. In a month-long field study conducted in southern California, two S3s were deployed alongside a URG denuder–filter-pack and a Particle-Into-Liquid Sampler combined with an Ion Chromatograph (PILS-IC). Collocated S3 sampler concentrations compared by linear regression show good agreement, with r2 = 0.99 and slope = 0.99 (±0.004) µg m−3 for sulfate and r2 = 0.99 and slope = 1.0 (±0.006) µg m−3 for nitrate. When compared to the URG denuder–filter-pack and the PILS-IC, the S3 sulfate and nitrate concentrations yielded correlations above 0.84 for the square of the correlation coefficient and regression slopes close to 1.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., Williams, P. I., Gallagher, M.
W., Jimenez, J. L., McDonald, A. G., Nemitz, E., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne,
J. T., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne
aerosol mass spectrometer 2. Measurements of fine particulate chemical
composition in two U.K. cities, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4091,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002359, 2003. 2. Budisulistiorini, S. H., Canagaratna, M. R., Croteau, P. L., Baumann, K.,
Edgerton, E. S., Kollman, M. S., Ng, N. L., Verma, V., Shaw, S. L., Knipping,
E. M., Worsnop, D. R., Jayne, J. T., Weber, R. J., and Surratt, J. D.:
Intercomparison of an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) with ambient
fine aerosol measurements in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
7, 1929–1941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1929-2014, 2014. 3. Canagaratna, M., Jayne, J., Jimenez, J., Allan, J., Alfarra, M., Zhang, Q.,
Onasch, T., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, R.,
Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M.J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits, P.,
and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient
aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom.
Rev., 26, 185–222, https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115, 2007. 4. Chow, J. C., Fujita, E. M., Watson, J. G., Lu, Z., Lawson, D. R., and
Ashbaugh, L. L.: Evaluation of filter-based aerosol measurements during the
1987 Southern California Air Quality Study, Environ. Monit. Assess., 30,
49–80, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00546199, 1994. 5. Drewnick, F., Schwab, J., Hogrefe, O., Peters, S., Husain, L., Diamond, D.,
Weber, R., and Demerjian, K.: Intercomparison and evaluation of four
semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments, Atmos. Environ.,
37, 3335–3350, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00351-0, 2003.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|