A generalized simulation capability for rotating- beam scatterometers
-
Published:2019-07-04
Issue:7
Volume:12
Page:3573-3594
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Li Zhen, Stoffelen AdORCID, Verhoef Anton
Abstract
Abstract. Rotating-beam wind scatterometers exist in two types: rotating
fan-beam and rotating pencil-beam. In our study, a generic simulation frame
is established and verified to assess the wind retrieval skill of the three
different scatterometers: SCAT on CFOSAT (China France Oceanography SATellite), WindRad (Chinese Wind Radar) on FY-3E, and SeaWinds on
QuikSCAT. Besides the comparison of the so-called first rank solution
retrieval skill of the input wind field, other figures of merit (FoMs) are
applied to statistically characterize the associated wind retrieval
performance from three aspects: wind vector root mean square error,
ambiguity susceptibility, and wind biases. The evaluation shows that,
overall, the wind retrieval quality of the three instruments can be ranked
from high to low as WindRad, SCAT, and SeaWinds, where the wind retrieval
quality strongly depends on the wind vector cell (WVC) location across the
swath. Usually, the higher the number of views, the better the wind
retrieval, but the effect of increasing the number of views reaches
saturation, considering the fact that the wind retrieval quality at the
nadir and sweet swath parts stays relatively similar for SCAT and WindRad.
On the other hand, the wind retrieval performance in the outer swath of
WindRad is improved substantially as compared to SCAT due to the increased
number of views. The results may be generally explained by the different
incidence angle ranges of SCAT and WindRad, mainly affecting azimuth
diversity around nadir and number of views in the outer swath. This
simulation frame can be used for optimizing the Bayesian wind retrieval
algorithm, in particular to avoid biases around nadir but also to
investigate resolution and accuracy through incorporating and analyzing the
spatial response functions of the simulated Level-1B data for each WVC.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference33 articles.
1. Bajo, M., De Biasio, F., Umgiesser, G., Vignudelli, S., and Zecchetto, S.:
Impact of using scatterometer and altimeter data on storm surge forecasting,
Ocean Model., 113, 85–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.03.014, 2017. 2. Chi, C. Y. and Li, F. K.: A comparative study of several wind estimation
algorithms for spaceborne scatterometers, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
26, 115–121, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3011, 1988. 3. de Vries, J., Stoffelen, A., and Beysens, J.: Ambiguity Removal and Product
Monitoring for SeaWinds, de Bilt, the Netherlands, available at:
http://www.knmi.nl/scatterometer/publications/ (last access: 2 July 2019), 2005. 4. Dou, F., Yin, H., and Gu, S.: Simulation of wind performance in tropical
cyclone for China's future dual-frequency wind field radar, Proc.
SPIE, 9264, 92641G1–92641G7, 2014. 5. Dunbar, R. S., Hsiao, S. V., Kim, Y., Pak, K. S., Weiss, B. H., and Zhang,
A.: Science Algorithm Specification, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 2001.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|