Post-flooding disturbance recovery promotes carbon capture in riparian zones
-
Published:2023-04-06
Issue:7
Volume:20
Page:1357-1370
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Zhu YihongORCID, Liu Ruihua, Zhang Huai, Liu Shaoda, Zhang Zhengfeng, Yu Fei-Hai, Gregoire Timothy G.
Abstract
Abstract. Vegetation, water, and carbon dioxide have complex
interactions on carbon mitigation in vegetation–water ecosystems. As one of
the major global change drivers of carbon sequestration, flooding
disturbance is a fundamental but poorly discussed topic to date. The aquatic
and associated riparian systems are highly dynamic vegetation–water carbon
capture systems driven by fluvial processes such as flooding. However, their
global carbon offset potential is largely unknown. This study examines daily
CO2 perturbations under flooding disturbance in the river (fluvial
area) and associated riparian areas with 2 year in situ observations along
the Lijiang. We find that, though the submerged riparian area behaved
as a carbon source during the flooding season (CO2 flux: 2.790 gm-2d-1), the riparian area and the fluvial area as a
whole transformed from a carbon source in pre-flooding season (1.833 gm-2d-1) to a carbon sink after recovery in
post-flooding season (−0.592 gm-2d-1). The fluvial
area sequestered carbon (−0.619 gm-2d-1) in
post-flooding season instead of releasing carbon as in pre-flooding season
(2.485 gm-2d-1). Also, the carbon sequestration
capacity of the riparian area was enhanced in post-flooding season
(pre-flooding season: −0.156 gm-2d-1, post-flooding
season: −0.500 gm-2d-1). We suggest that post-disturbance
recovery of riparian vegetation played a vital role in this transformation,
due to its stronger carbon uptake capacity after recovery from the flooding
disturbances. The findings shed light on the quantitative modelling of the
riparian carbon cycle under flooding disturbance and underlined the
importance of the proper restoration of riparian systems to achieve global
carbon offset.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference53 articles.
1. Agilent Technologies: User Manuals Agilent 7890A Gas Chromatograph Operating Guide, Agilent Tchnologies, https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/usermanuals/Public/G3430-90011.pdf (last access: 30 March 2023), 2010. 2. Allen, D. E., Dalal, R. C., Rennenberg, H., Meyer, R. L., Reeves, S., and Schmidt, S.: Spatial and temporal variation of nitrous oxide and methane flux between subtropical mangrove sediments and the atmosphere, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 622–631, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.09.013, 2007. 3. Anderson, N. J., Heathcote, A. J., Engstrom, D. R., and Globocarb data contributors: Anthropogenic alteration of nutrient supply increases the global freshwater carbon sink, Sci. Adv., 6, eaaw2145, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2145, 2020. 4. Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F., and Rey-Benayas, J. M.: Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities, Trends Ecol. Evol., 26, 541–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011, 2011. 5. Colmer, T. D. and Voesenek, L. A. C. J.: Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments, Funct. Plant Biol., 36, 665–681, https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09144, 2009.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|