Evaluating the impact of blowing-snow sea salt aerosol on springtime BrO and O<sub>3</sub> in the Arctic
-
Published:2020-06-25
Issue:12
Volume:20
Page:7335-7358
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Huang Jiayue, Jaeglé Lyatt, Chen QianjieORCID, Alexander BeckyORCID, Sherwen TomásORCID, Evans Mat J.ORCID, Theys Nicolas, Choi Sungyeon
Abstract
Abstract. We use the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model to examine the
influence of bromine release from blowing-snow sea salt aerosol (SSA) on
springtime bromine activation and O3 depletion events (ODEs) in the
Arctic lower troposphere. We evaluate our simulation against observations of
tropospheric BrO vertical column densities (VCDtropo) from the GOME-2 (second Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment)
and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) spaceborne instruments for 3 years (2007–2009), as well as
against surface observations of O3. We conduct a simulation with
blowing-snow SSA emissions from first-year sea ice (FYI; with a surface snow
salinity of 0.1 psu) and multi-year sea ice (MYI; with a surface snow
salinity of 0.05 psu), assuming a factor of 5 bromide enrichment of surface
snow relative to seawater. This simulation captures the magnitude of
observed March–April GOME-2 and OMI VCDtropo to within 17 %, as well
as their spatiotemporal variability (r=0.76–0.85). Many of the large-scale
bromine explosions are successfully reproduced, with the exception of events
in May, which are absent or systematically underpredicted in the model. If
we assume a lower salinity on MYI (0.01 psu), some of the bromine explosions
events observed over MYI are not captured, suggesting that blowing snow over
MYI is an important source of bromine activation. We find that the modeled
atmospheric deposition onto snow-covered sea ice becomes highly enriched in
bromide, increasing from enrichment factors of ∼5 in
September–February to 10–60 in May, consistent with composition observations of freshly fallen snow. We propose that this progressive enrichment in
deposition could enable blowing-snow-induced halogen activation to propagate
into May and might explain our late-spring underestimate in VCDtropo.
We estimate that the atmospheric deposition of SSA could increase snow salinity
by up to 0.04 psu between February and April, which could be an important
source of salinity for surface snow on MYI as well as FYI covered by deep
snowpack. Inclusion of halogen release from blowing-snow SSA in our
simulations decreases monthly mean Arctic surface O3 by 4–8 ppbv
(15 %–30 %) in March and 8–14 ppbv (30 %–40 %) in April. We reproduce a
transport event of depleted O3 Arctic air down to 40∘ N
observed at many sub-Arctic surface sites in early April 2007. While our
simulation captures 25 %–40 % of the ODEs observed at coastal Arctic surface
sites, it underestimates the magnitude of many of these events and entirely
misses 60 %–75 % of ODEs. This difficulty in reproducing observed surface
ODEs could be related to the coarse horizontal resolution of the model, the
known biases in simulating Arctic boundary layer exchange processes, the
lack of detailed chlorine chemistry, and/or the fact that we did not include
direct halogen activation by snowpack chemistry.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference116 articles.
1. Abbatt, J. P. D., Thomas, J. L., Abrahamsson, K., Boxe, C., Granfors, A., Jones, A. E., King, M. D., Saiz-Lopez, A., Shepson, P. B., Sodeau, J., Toohey, D. W., Toubin, C., von Glasow, R., Wren, S. N., and Yang, X.: Halogen activation via interactions with environmental ice and snow in the polar lower troposphere and other regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6237–6271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6237-2012, 2012. 2. Alvarez-Aviles, L., Simpson, W. R., Douglas, T. A., Sturm, M., Perovich, D.,
and Domine, F.: Frost flower chemical composition during growth and its
implications for aerosol production and bromine activation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D21304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010277, 2008. 3. AMAP: AMAP Assessment 2011: Mercury in the Arctic, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, 193 pp., available at:
https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2011-mercury-in-the-arctic/90
(last access: 13 July 2018), 2011. 4. Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Jenkin, M. E., Mellouki, A., Rossi, M. J., Troe, J., and Wallington, T. J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume VI – heterogeneous reactions with liquid substrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8045–8228, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8045-2013, 2013. 5. Barrie, L. A., Bottenheim, J. W., Schnell, R. C., Crutzen, P. J., and
Rasmussen, R. A.: Ozone destruction and photochemical reactions at polar
sunrise in the lower Arctic atmosphere, Nature, 334, 138–141,
https://doi.org/10.1038/334138a0, 1988.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|