The benefits of gravimeter observations for modelling water storage changes at the field scale
-
Published:2010-09-01
Issue:9
Volume:14
Page:1715-1730
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Creutzfeldt B.,Güntner A.,Vorogushyn S.,Merz B.
Abstract
Abstract. Water storage is the fundamental state variable of hydrological systems. However, comprehensive data on total water storage changes (WSC) are practically inaccessible by hydrological measurement techniques at the field or catchment scale, and hydrological models are highly uncertain in representing the storage term due to the lack of adequate validation or calibration data. In this study, we assess the benefit of temporal gravimeter measurements for modelling WSC at the field scale. A simple conceptual hydrological model is calibrated and evaluated against records of a superconducting gravimeter (SG), soil moisture, and groundwater time series. The model is validated against independently estimated WSC based on lysimeter measurements. Using gravimeter data as a calibration constraint improves the model results substantially in terms of predictive capability and variation of the behavioural model runs. Thanks to their capacity to integrate over different storage components and a larger area, gravimeters provide information on total WSC that can be used to constrain the overall status of the hydrological system in a model. The general problem of specifying the internal model structure or individual parameter sets can, however, not be solved with gravimeters alone.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference102 articles.
1. Abe, M., Takemoto, S., Fukuda, Y., Higashi, T., Imanishi, Y., Iwano, S., Ogasawara, S., Kobayashi, Y., Dwipa, S., and Kusuma, D. S.: Hydrological effects on the superconducting gravimeter observation in Bandung, J. Geodynam., 41, 288–295, 2006. 2. Allen, R. G., Walter, I. A., Elliott, R. L., Howell, T. A., Itenfisu, D., Jensen, M. E., and Snyder, R. L.: The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA, 2005. 3. Allerup, P.: A comprehensive model for correcting point precipitation, Nordic Hydrol., 28, 1–20, 1997. Amalvict, M., Hinderer, J., Makinen, J., Rosat, S., and Rogister, Y.: Long-term and seasonal gravity changes at the Strasbourg station and their relation to crustal deformation and hydrology, J. Geodynam., 38, 343–353, 2004. 4. Bergström, S.: The HBV model – its structure and applications., Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Norrköping, 1992. 5. Beven, K., and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Proc., 6, 279–298, 1992.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|