Estimation of high return period flood quantiles using additional non-systematic information with upper bounded statistical models
-
Published:2010-12-20
Issue:12
Volume:14
Page:2617-2628
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Botero B. A.,Francés F.
Abstract
Abstract. This paper proposes the estimation of high return period quantiles using upper bounded distribution functions with Systematic and additional Non-Systematic information. The aim of the developed methodology is to reduce the estimation uncertainty of these quantiles, assuming the upper bound parameter of these distribution functions as a statistical estimator of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). Three upper bounded distribution functions, firstly used in Hydrology in the 90's (referred to in this work as TDF, LN4 and EV4), were applied at the Jucar River in Spain. Different methods to estimate the upper limit of these distribution functions have been merged with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method. Results show that it is possible to obtain a statistical estimate of the PMF value and to establish its associated uncertainty. The behaviour for high return period quantiles is different for the three evaluated distributions and, for the case study, the EV4 gave better descriptive results. With enough information, the associated estimation uncertainty for very high return period quantiles is considered acceptable, even for the PMF estimate. From the robustness analysis, the EV4 distribution function appears to be more robust than the GEV and TCEV unbounded distribution functions in a typical Mediterranean river and Non-Systematic information availability scenario. In this scenario and if there is an upper limit, the GEV quantile estimates are clearly unacceptable.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference50 articles.
1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Evaluation procedures for hydrologic safety of dams, Spillway Design Flood Selection, Surface Water Hydrology Committee, Report 8726–26520, ASCE, New York, USA, 1988. 2. Benito, G., Lang, M., Barriendos, M., Llasat, M. C., Frances, F., Ouarda, T., Thorndycraft, V. R., Enzel, Y., Bardossy, A., Coeur, D., and Bobée, B.: Use of Systematic, Palaeoflood and Historical Data for the improvement of flood risk estimation, Review of scientific methods, Nat. Hazards, 31, 623–643, 2004. 3. Botero, B. A.: Estimación de Crecidas de alto período de retorno mediante funciones de distribución con límite superior e información No Sistemática, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Hydraulic Engineering and Environment, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 223 pp., 2006. 4. Calenda, G., Mancini, C. P., and Volpi, E.: Distribution of the extreme peak floods of the Tiber River from the XV century, Adv. Water Resour., 28(5), 615–625, 2005. 5. Calenda, G., Mancini, C. P., and Volpi, E.: Selection of the probabilistic model of extreme floods: The case of the River Tiber in Rome, J. Hydrol., 371(1–4), 1–11, 2009.
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|