Airborne measurements of fire emission factors for African biomass burning sampled during the MOYA campaign
-
Published:2020-12-11
Issue:23
Volume:20
Page:15443-15459
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Barker Patrick A.ORCID, Allen GrantORCID, Gallagher MartinORCID, Pitt Joseph R.ORCID, Fisher Rebecca E.ORCID, Bannan ThomasORCID, Nisbet Euan G., Bauguitte Stéphane J.-B.ORCID, Pasternak DominikaORCID, Cliff Samuel, Schimpf Marina B., Mehra ArchitORCID, Bower Keith N.ORCID, Lee James D.ORCID, Coe Hugh, Percival Carl J.
Abstract
Abstract. Airborne sampling of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2),
carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrous oxide (N2O) mole fractions was
conducted during field campaigns targeting fires over Senegal in February and
March 2017 and Uganda in January 2019. The majority of fire plumes sampled
were close to or directly over burning vegetation, with the exception of two
longer-range flights over the West African Atlantic seaboard
(100–300 km from source), where the continental outflow of biomass
burning emissions from a wider area of West Africa was sampled. Fire emission
factors (EFs) and modified combustion efficiencies (MCEs) were estimated from
the enhancements in measured mole fractions. For the Senegalese fires, mean
EFs and corresponding uncertainties in units of gram per kilogram of dry fuel were 1.8±0.19 for CH4, 1633±171.4 for CO2, and 67±7.4 for CO, with a mean MCE of 0.94±0.005. For the Ugandan fires, mean
EFs were 3.1±0.35 for CH4, 1610±169.7 for CO2,
and 78±8.9 for CO, with a mean modified combustion efficiency of 0.93±0.004. A mean N2O EF of 0.08±0.002 g kg−1 is
also reported for one flight over Uganda; issues with temperature control of
the instrument optical bench prevented N2O EFs from being obtained
for other flights over Uganda. This study has provided new datasets of African
biomass burning EFs and MCEs for two distinct study regions, in which both
have been studied little by aircraft measurement previously. These results
highlight the important intracontinental variability of biomass burning trace
gas emissions and can be used to better constrain future biomass burning
emission budgets. More generally, these results highlight the importance of
regional and fuel-type variability when attempting to spatially scale biomass
burning emissions. Further work to constrain EFs at more local scales and for
more specific (and quantifiable) fuel types will serve to improve global
estimates of biomass burning emissions of climate-relevant gases.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Andreae, M. O.: Biomass burning: Its history, use and distribution and its
impact on environmental quality and global climate, in: Global Biomass Burning:
Atmospheric, Climate and Biospheric Implications, edited by: Levine, J. S., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3–21,
1991. 2. Andreae, M. O.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an
updated assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8523–8546,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019, 2019. 3. Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001382, 2001. 4. Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global
modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model
description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807, 2001. 5. Brownlow, R., Lowry, D., Fisher, R. E., France, J. L., Lanoisellé, M.,
White, B., Wooster, M. J., Zhang, T., and Nisbet, E. G.: Isotopic Ratios of
Tropical Methane Emissions by Atmospheric Measurement, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 31, 1408–1419, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005689, 2017.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|