Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling for 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success
-
Published:2019-07-15
Issue:7
Volume:12
Page:2941-2960
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Scalzo RichardORCID, Kohn David, Olierook HugoORCID, Houseman GregoryORCID, Chandra Rohitash, Girolami Mark, Cripps Sally
Abstract
Abstract. The rigorous quantification of uncertainty in geophysical inversions is a
challenging problem. Inversions are often ill-posed and the likelihood surface
may be multi-modal; properties of any single mode become inadequate uncertainty
measures, and sampling methods become inefficient for irregular posteriors
or high-dimensional parameter spaces. We explore the
influences of different choices made by the practitioner on the efficiency and accuracy of Bayesian geophysical inversion methods that rely on Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling to assess uncertainty using a multi-sensor inversion
of the three-dimensional structure and composition of a region in the
Cooper Basin of South Australia as a case study. The inversion is performed
using an updated version of the Obsidian distributed inversion software.
We find that the posterior for this
inversion has a complex local covariance structure, hindering the efficiency of
adaptive sampling methods that adjust the proposal based on the chain history.
Within the context of a parallel-tempered Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for
exploring high-dimensional multi-modal posteriors, a preconditioned
Crank–Nicolson proposal outperforms more conventional forms of random walk.
Aspects of the problem setup, such as priors on petrophysics and on 3-D
geological structure, affect the shape and separation of posterior modes,
influencing sampling performance as well as the inversion results. The use of
uninformative priors on sensor noise enables
optimal weighting among multiple sensors even if noise levels are uncertain.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference73 articles.
1. Agostinetti, N. P. and Malinverno, A.: Receiver function inversion by
trans-dimensional Monte Carlo sampling, Geophys. J. Int.,
181, 858–872, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04530.x, 2010. a, b, c 2. Anand, R. R. and Butt, C. R. M.: A guide for mineral exploration through the
regolith in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia, Aust. J.
Earth Sci., 57, 1015–1114, 2010. a 3. Beardsmore, G.: Data fusion and machine learning for geothermal target
exploration and characterisation, Tech. rep., NICTA Final Report,
available at: https://arena.gov.au/projects/data-fusion-and-machine-learning-for-geothermal/
(last access: 10 July 2019),
2014. a, b, c, d 4. Beardsmore, G., Durrant-Whyte, H., McCalman, L., O’Callaghan, S., and Reid,
A.: A Bayesian inference tool for geophysical joint inversions, ASEG Extended
Abstracts, 2016, 1–10, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p 5. Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Tkalcic, H., Arroucau, P., Gallagher, K., and
Rawlinson, N.: Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface
wave dispersion, Solid Earth, 117, B02301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008560, 2012. a, b, c
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|