Evaluation of Monte Carlo tools for high energy atmospheric physics
-
Published:2016-11-08
Issue:11
Volume:9
Page:3961-3974
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Rutjes Casper, Sarria DavidORCID, Skeltved Alexander Broberg, Luque AlejandroORCID, Diniz GabrielORCID, Østgaard Nikolai, Ebert UteORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The emerging field of high energy atmospheric physics (HEAP) includes terrestrial gamma-ray flashes, electron–positron beams and gamma-ray glows from thunderstorms. Similar emissions of high energy particles occur in pulsed high voltage discharges. Understanding these phenomena requires appropriate models for the interaction of electrons, positrons and photons of up to 40 MeV energy with atmospheric air. In this paper, we benchmark the performance of the Monte Carlo codes Geant4, EGS5 and FLUKA developed in other fields of physics and of the custom-made codes GRRR and MC-PEPTITA against each other within the parameter regime relevant for high energy atmospheric physics. We focus on basic tests, namely on the evolution of monoenergetic and directed beams of electrons, positrons and photons with kinetic energies between 100 keV and 40 MeV through homogeneous air in the absence of electric and magnetic fields, using a low energy cutoff of 50 keV. We discuss important differences between the results of the different codes and provide plausible explanations. We also test the computational performance of the codes. The Supplement contains all results, providing a first benchmark for present and future custom-made codes that are more flexible in including electrodynamic interactions.
Funder
European Research Council European Science Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference66 articles.
1. Adachi, T., Takahashi, Y., Ohya, H., Tsuchiya, F., Yamashita, K., Yamamoto, M., and Hashiguchi, H.: Monitoring of Lightning Activity in Southeast Asia: Scientific Objectives and Strategies, Kyoto Working Papers on Area Studies: G-COE Series, 2008. 2. Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., et al.: GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A506, 250–303, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8, 2003. 3. Andreo, P.: Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics, Phys. Med. Biol., 36, 861, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/36/7/001, 1991. 4. Babich, L., Donskoy, E., Kutsyk, I., and Roussel-Dupré, R.: The feedback mechanism of runaway air breakdown, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09809, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021744, 2005. 5. Basaglia, T., Bell, Z., Dressendorfer, P., Larkin, A., and Pia, M.: Writing software or writing scientific articles?, in: Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2007, NSS'07, IEEE, Vol. 1, 219–226, IEEE, 2007.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|