Global evaluation of Doppler velocity errors of EarthCARE cloud-profiling radar using a global storm-resolving simulation
-
Published:2023-06-28
Issue:12
Volume:16
Page:3211-3219
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Hagihara YuichiroORCID, Ohno Yuichi, Horie Hiroaki, Roh Woosub, Satoh MasakiORCID, Kubota TakujiORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The cloud-profiling radar (CPR) on the Earth Clouds,
Aerosol, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) satellite (EC-CPR) is the first
satellite-borne Doppler radar. In a previous study, we examined
the effects of horizontal (along-track) integration and simple unfolding
methods on the reduction of Doppler errors in the EC-CPR observations, and
those effects were evaluated using two limited scenes in limited-latitude
and low-pulse-repetition-frequency (PRF) settings. In this study, the amount
of data used was significantly increased, and the area of the data used was
extended globally. Not only low-PRF but also high-PRF settings were
examined. We calculated the EC-CPR-observed Doppler velocity from pulse-pair
covariances using the radar reflectivity factor and Doppler velocity
obtained from a satellite data simulator and a global storm-resolving
simulation. The global data were divided into five latitudinal zones, and
each standard deviation of Doppler errors for 5 dBZe after 10 km
integration was calculated. In the case of the low-PRF setting, the error
without unfolding correction for the tropics reached a maximum of 2.2 m s−1 and then decreased toward the poles (0.43 m s−1). The error
with unfolding correction for the tropics became much smaller at 0.63 m s−1. In the case of the high-PRF setting, the error without unfolding
correction for the tropics reached a maximum of 0.78 m s−1 and then
decreased toward the poles (0.19 m s−1). The error with unfolding
correction for the tropics was 0.29 m s−1, less than half the value
without the correction. The results of the analyses of the simulated data
indicated that the zonal mean frequency of precipitation echoes was highest
in the tropics and decreased toward the poles. Considering a limitation of
the unfolding correction for discrimination between large upward velocity
and large precipitation falling velocity, the latitudinal variation in the
standard deviation of Doppler error can be explained by the precipitation
echo distribution.
Funder
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Amayenc, P., Testud, J., and Marzoug, M.: Proposal for a Spaceborne
Dual-Beam Rain Radar with Doppler Capability, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 10,
262–276, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1993)010<0262:PFASDB>2.0.CO;2, 1993. 2. Bargen, D. W. and Brown, R. C.: Interactive radar velocity unfolding, 19th
Conference on Radar Meteorology, 278–285, 15–18 April, Miami Beach, FL., 1980. 3. Battaglia, A. and Tanelli, S.: DOMUS: DOppler MUltiple-Scattering simulator,
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49, 442–450,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2052818, 2011. 4. Ceccaldi, M., Delanoë, J., Hogan, R. J., Pounder, N. L., Protat, A., and
Pelon, J.: From CloudSat-CALIPSO to EarthCare: Evolution of the DARDAR cloud
classification and its comparison to airborne radar-lidar observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7962–7981, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50579,
2013. 5. CloudSat Data Processing Center: 2B-GEOPROF R04 product, CloudSat DPC [data set], https://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/data-products/2b-geoprof (last access: 12 November 2022), 2023.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|